Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693728›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

Development of

Elizabeth A Mosley, Nikki Zite, Christine Dehlendorf, Ashley Deal, Raelynn O'Leary, Sharon Achilles, Amber E Barnato, Daniel Hall, Sonya Borrero

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth A MosleyDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Nikki ZiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA.
Christine DehlendorfDepartments of Family & Community Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Ashley DealDezudio, Pittsburgh, PA 15221, USA.
Raelynn O'LearyDezudio, Pittsburgh, PA 15221, USA.
Sharon AchillesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Amber E BarnatoThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Daniel HallDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sonya BorreroDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Developing and testing a decision support tool for women making tubal sterilization decisions.R01MD011678 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BORRERO, SONYA B., MOSLEY, ELIZABETH ANN · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a patient-centered, web-based decision aid to support informed and value-concordant decision making among Medicaid enrollees considering tubal sterilization. Methods: We used the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) to guide systematic development of our decision aid. We interviewed 15 obstetrician-gynecologists and 40 women, who had considered or were considering tubal sterilization. A Steering Committee-comprising healthcare providers, social scientists, reproductive health and justice advocates, and people with lived experience-provided feedback and direction. We developed English and Spanish prototypes, which were beta tested with 24 women. Results: The resulting web-based Conclusion: Innovation: This is a novel and timely web-based decision tool for tubal sterilization, when demand for permanent contraception is rapidly increasing post-

Indexed as

Economic disparitiesMedicaidPatient-centered careReproductive autonomyTubal sterilization

Identifiers

PMID37693728
PMCPMC10483066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.