Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Understanding pandemic resilience: a mixed-methods exploration of burdens, resources, and determinants of good or poor well-being among Austrian psychotherapists.

Yvonne Schaffler, Monika Bauer, Barbara Schein, Andrea Jesser, Thomas Probst, Christoph Pieh, Elke Humer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yvonne SchafflerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.
Monika BauerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.
Barbara ScheinDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.
Andrea JesserDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.
Thomas ProbstDivision of Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Christoph PiehDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.
Elke HumerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the mental health burden on the general population, resulting in increased demands on mental healthcare professionals, including psychotherapists. This cross-sectional study assessed the challenges and resources encountered by 513 psychotherapists based on an online survey conducted between April and May 2022. Methods: Qualitative methods content analysis of written reports was employed to investigate the emerging challenges and sources of support during the pandemic. A comparative analysis of burdens, resources, sociodemographic factors and daily physical activity was conducted to discern patterns of good and poor well-being. Results: The predominant burden identified was mental health-related issues, followed by global crises and government-imposed restrictions to mitigate virus transmission. Essential resources encompassed social connections, mindfulness, work satisfaction, and internal processes. Notably, psychotherapists demonstrating good well-being were older, more physically active, had a lower proportion of females, were employed in private practices rather than in institutionalized settings, had more years of professional experience and treated more patients weekly than their counterparts with poor well-being. Furthermore, they exhibited greater optimism, health focus, and satisfaction with their coping methods. Discussion: These findings can help develop support systems, policies, and educational programs to better support mental health professionals during global crises and offer strategies for individual practitioners to maintain their well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19PsychotherapistsAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPandemicscoping strategiesCOVID-19 pandemicphysical activitypsychotherapistsqualitative content analysisresourceswell-being (WHO-5)

Identifiers

PMID37693716
PMCPMC10483144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.