ArticleJPRAS open2023
E-cigarette explosions: patient profiles, injury patterns, clinical management, and outcome.
Article in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaping prevention curriculum in India.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: E-cigarette abuse, also known as vaping, is a widespread habit. Recently, there have been increasing reports of explosions of these devices resulting in serious burn injuries, especially to the groin, hand, and face. Overheating rechargeable lithium-ion batteries are supposed to be the responsible mechanism, especially in low quality fabrications. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, data of 46 patients are presented and analyzed. In addition to information on demographics, injury patterns, and treatment options, this is the first study investigating outcome after an average of 13 months via a standardized telephone interview of 31 patients (67%). Patients were specifically asked regarding their outcome, vaping habits, technical modifications to their devices and supply source. Results: Patients were mainly male (98.2%) with a median age of 36 years. Typical injury patterns included the groin region (n = 32; 69%), hands (n = 12; 25%) and face (n = 3; 7%). All patients underwent debridement, in nine cases hydrotherapeutically. 61% (n = 28) underwent consecutive tangential necrectomy and subsequent split thickness skin graft transplantation. Wound infection was observed in 18 patients (39%), with burn depth as a significant risk factor (p < 0.001). 91% of the followed-up patients were satisfied. Surprisingly, 38% were still using e-cigarettes. 42% (n = 13) reported manual modifications of their devices to prolong battery life or increasing smoke production. Conclusions: Injuries from exploding e-cigarettes can be serious and should be treated in a specialized burn center. E-cigarette explosions lead to characteristic injury patterns and often need surgical treatment. This should be made more public to reduce their use and keep people from modifying the devices. The counterintuitive and irrational observation of a high rate of abuse even after the injury underlines their addiction potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.