ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
ClipperQTL: ultrafast and powerful eGene identification method.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central task in expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis is to identify cis-eGenes (henceforth "eGenes"), i.e., genes whose expression levels are regulated by at least one local genetic variant. Among the existing eGene identification methods, FastQTL is considered the gold standard but is computationally expensive as it requires thousands of permutations for each gene. Alternative methods such as eigenMT and TreeQTL have lower power than FastQTL. In this work, we propose ClipperQTL, which reduces the number of permutations needed from thousands to 20 for data sets with large sample sizes (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.