ArticleFrontiers in health services2023
Implementing AI in healthcare-the relevance of trust: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health Care Professionals' Experience of Using AI: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Concordance between an artificial intelligence self-triage programme and physical triage.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2026Observational
- From Assistance to Autonomy: Acceptability of Progressive Artificial Intelligence Integration in Facial Reconstructive Surgery-Protocol for Within-Subjects Vignette Experiment Among Romanian Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Transformation in Health Care: Are We on the Right Track?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of AI-Assisted Clinical Decision-Making in Jordan: A Qualitative Study of Trust, Accountability, System Readiness, and Professional Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Screening for Missed Opportunities for Diagnosis in the ED Using eTriggers and Large Language Models.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the Oxford Attitudes to Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Scale.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Clinical Plausibility in Large Language Model Robustness Testing for Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Exploring Students' Perceptions and Usage of Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Mental Health: A Preliminary Study in Higher Education in Qatar.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Anxiety and Depression Associated With the Dependent Use of Generative AI in Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Investigating the Implementation and Impact of AI-Assisted Fall Prevention in Hospitals: Protocol for a Multicenter, Multimethod Observational Study in Sweden (SAFE).JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Questionnaires on Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Among Health Care Students: Cross-Cultural Translation Into French and Linguistic Validation.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- A Trustable Spine Abnormalities Classification System Using ResNet50 and VGG16 Supported by Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clarifying validation terminologies in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Anticipating Moral and Economic Considerations, Opportunities, and Potential Frictions for AI in Medical Imaging: Multistakeholder Cocreation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Determinants of Trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Health-Related Decision-Making Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dental students' knowledge, perceptions, and educational needs regarding artificial intelligence: a multinational cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Implementing an Artificial Intelligence Decision Support System in Radiology: Prospective Qualitative Evaluation Study Using the Nonadoption Abandonment Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Awareness, trust, and expectations of AI for glaucoma care among Bulgarian ophthalmologists: Role of demographic factors.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The process of translation of AI and its potential benefits into practice in healthcare services has been slow in spite of its rapid development. Trust in AI in relation to implementation processes is an important aspect. Without a clear understanding, the development of effective implementation strategies will not be possible, nor will AI advance despite the significant investments and possibilities. Objective: This study aimed to explore the scientific literature regarding how trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare is conceptualized and what influences trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare. Methods: This scoping review included five scientific databases. These were searched to identify publications related to the study aims. Articles were included if they were published in English, after 2012, and peer-reviewed. Two independent reviewers conducted an abstract and full-text review, as well as carrying out a thematic analysis with an inductive approach to address the study aims. The review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: A total of eight studies were included in the final review. We found that trust was conceptualized in different ways. Most empirical studies had an individual perspective where trust was directed toward the technology's capability. Two studies focused on trust as relational between people in the context of the AI application rather than as having trust in the technology itself. Trust was also understood by its determinants and as having a mediating role, positioned between characteristics and AI use. The thematic analysis yielded three themes: individual characteristics, AI characteristics and contextual characteristics, which influence trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare. Conclusions: Findings showed that the conceptualization of trust in AI differed between the studies, as well as which determinants they accounted for as influencing trust. Few studies looked beyond individual characteristics and AI characteristics. Future empirical research addressing trust in AI in relation to implementation in healthcare should have a more holistic view of the concept to be able to manage the many challenges, uncertainties, and perceived risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.