Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693146›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023

Clinical outcomes of radioactive seed brachytherapy and microwave ablation in inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Zhe Ji, Yang Ni, Chuang He, Bin Huo, Shifeng Liu, Yanli Ma, Yuqing Song, Miaomiao Hu, Kaixian Zhang, Zhe Wang and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhe JiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital Beijing, China.
Yang NiDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chuang HeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (Treatment Center of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Radioactive Particles), First Affiliated Hospital of The Army Medical University Chongqing, China.
Bin HuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University Tianjin, China.
Shifeng LiuDepartment of Intervention Therapy, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yanli MaDepartment of Oncology, Staff Hospital of Chengde Iron and Steel Group Co., Ltd. Chengde, Hebei, China.
Yuqing SongDepartment of Oncology, Staff Hospital of Chengde Iron and Steel Group Co., Ltd. Chengde, Hebei, China.
Miaomiao HuDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Tengzhou, Shandong, China.
Kaixian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Tengzhou, Shandong, China.
Zhe WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xinxin ZhaoDepartment of Oncology Radiotherapy, The First People's Hospital of Kerqin District Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, China.
Hongmei HanDepartment of Oncology Radiotherapy, The First People's Hospital of Kerqin District Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yufeng WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xuzhou Cancer Hospital Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ruoyu WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Shude ChaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (Treatment Center of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Radioactive Particles), First Affiliated Hospital of The Army Medical University Chongqing, China.
Xiaokun HuDepartment of Intervention Therapy, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xuequan HuangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (Treatment Center of Minimally Invasive Intervention and Radioactive Particles), First Affiliated Hospital of The Army Medical University Chongqing, China.
Xin YeDepartment of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University Jinan, Shandong, China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital Beijing, China.
Collaborative Group (United States) · USArmy Medical University · CNHBIS (China) · CNPeking University · CNQingdao University · CNJiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of radioactive iodine-125 seed ablation brachytherapy (RSABT) in comparison to microwave ablation therapy (MWAT) for treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from stage I NSCLC patients who underwent CT-guided RSABT or MWAT. The primary outcomes measured were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the occurrence of adverse events. Of the patients included in the study, 71 underwent RSABT and 105 received MWAT. The median follow-up time for these groups was 47.4 months and 60 months, respectively. The PFS rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year for the RSABT group were 87.3%, 72.6%, and 65.8%, while for the MWAT group, they were 89.5%, 69.3%, and 43.7%, respectively (P = 0.011). The OS rates at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year for the RSABT group were 97.2%, 78.1%, and 66.1%, and for the MWAT group, they were 99%, 75.8%, and 55%, respectively (P = 0.112). Upon multivariate analysis, the treatment modality was identified as an independent predictor of PFS (P = 0.008). Additionally, both sex and T stage were found to be independent predictors of both PFS and OS (P < 0.05). Adverse events, such as pneumothorax, occurred in 50% of the MWAT group and 39% of the RSABT group (P = 0.313). The incidence of pleural effusion was 44% in the MWAT group compared to 14% in the RSABT group (P < 0.001). Needle bleeding was observed in 32% of the RSABT group and 5% of the MWAT group (P < 0.001). We conclude RSABT demonstrates promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of stage I NSCLC. However, further studies are essential to validate these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

clinical efficacyEarly stagemicrowave ablationnon-small cell lung cancerradioactive seed implantation

Identifiers

PMID37693146
PMCPMC10492108
OpenAlexW4386593266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.