ArticleHome health care management & practice2023
Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of in-home stroke education for stroke survivors.
Article in Home health care management & practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rehabilitation Transition Program to Improve Community Participation Among Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Community Participation Transition After Stroke (COMPASS) Randomized Controlled Trial: Effect on Adverse Health Events.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Trial
- Personalized Video-Based Educational Platform to Improve Stroke Knowledge: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Barriers to learning after a stroke may prevent stroke survivors from acquiring helpful information regarding stroke prevention and preparedness. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel in-home stroke education program for survivors in the acute phase following a stroke. Study participants completed four in-home education sessions about stroke prevention and preparedness following their discharge home from inpatient rehabilitation. Sessions were designed to be completed within an 8-week period. Sessions were presented with evidence-based teaching methods and could be tailored to individual needs. Participants completed short quizzes before and after each education session to measure knowledge attainment. Forty-nine participants were included in this study. On average, the program was completed in 10 weeks, or 69.5 days (SD 29.6), and visits lasted 66.26 minutes; 81.5% of participants completed Visit 1, 77.5% completed Visit 2, and 73.5% completed Visits 3 and 4. Statistically significant changes from pretest-to-posttest scores were found for all races and genders and for ages 50-79. There was no significant change in pretest-to-posttest scores for participants over age 80 (n = 3). Results show that delivering a stroke education program can be accomplished, on an expanded timeline. The program was effective in increasing stroke knowledge for participants recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation following a stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.