Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693114›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS-guided

Ahmad H Ali, Naren S Nallapeta, Muhammad N Yousaf, Gregory F Petroski, Neal Sharma, Deepthi S Rao, Feng Yin, Ryan M Davis, Ambarish Bhat, Ahmed I A Swi and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06231082 naunknown statusnot on this map

Bloody or Well Done. How Would You Like Your Liver Biopsy, Sir? Post Liver bIopsy abdoMinal PaIn as Predictive Factor for Liver bleeDing (LIMPID)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2024 to 2024Enrolled78ConditionsLiver Disease ParenchymalArmsGroup one - percutaneous (P), Group two - EUS FNB (E)
NCT07701031 completednot on this map

Assessing EUS and Percutaneous Untargeted Liver Biopsy Quality: A Sequential-Period Cluster-Randomized Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital MuensterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled146ConditionsLiver Cirrhosis, Liver Disease Chronic, Liver TransplantArmsEUS Liver biopsy 19G FNA, EUS LB 19G FNB, EUS LB 22G FNB, EUS LB 22G FNA, PC-LB 18G Trucut
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: refining a new approach.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endo-Hepatology: Paradigm Shift in Endosonographic Diagnosis for Liver Disease to Digestive Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. EUS-guidedEndoscopic ultrasound
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ahmad H AliDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Naren S NallapetaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Muhammad N YousafDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Gregory F PetroskiBiostatistics and Research Design Unit, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Neal SharmaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Deepthi S RaoDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Feng YinDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ryan M DavisDepartment of Radiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ambarish BhatDepartment of Radiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ahmed I A SwiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Alhareth Al-JubooriDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Jamal A IbdahDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ghassan M HammoudDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Prospective studies comparing EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) to percutaneous LB (PC-LB) are scarce. We compared the efficacy and safety of EUS-LB with those of PC-LB in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Methods: Between 2020 and 2021, patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of patients with ≥11 complete portal tracts (CPTs). The sample size (n = 80) was calculated based on the assumption that 60% of those in the EUS-LB and 90% of those in the PC-LB group will have LB with ≥11 CPTs. The secondary outcomes included proportion of patients in whom a diagnosis was established, number of CPTs, pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Intensity), duration of hospital stay, and adverse events. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (median age, 53 years); 67.5% were female. Sixty percent of those in the EUS-LB and 75.0% of those in the PC-LB group met the primary outcome ( Conclusions: EUS-guided liver biopsy was safe, effective, better tolerated, and associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Indexed as

Complete portal tractsEfficacyEUSFine needle biopsyHistological diagnosisLiver biopsyPercutaneousSafety

Identifiers

PMID37693114
PMCPMC10437149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.