Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693112›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Tissue amount and diagnostic yield of a novel franseen EUS-FNB and a standard EUS-FNA needle-A randomized controlled study in solid pancreatic lesions.

Bojan Kovacevic, Anders Toxværd, Pia Klausen, Michael H Larsen, Simon Grützmeier, Sönke Detlefsen, John Gásdal Karstensen, Lene Brink, Hazem Hassan, Estrid Høgdall and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07012694 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Diagnostic Yield and Tissue Adequacy of 22G Adapt Versus 22G Franseen Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Lesions Under Endoscopic Ultrasound Guidance), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07012694 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Diagnostic Yield and Tissue Adequacy of 22G Adapt Versus 22G Franseen Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Lesions Under Endoscopic Ultrasound Guidance

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled576ConditionsPancreatic Neoplasms, Mediastinal Neoplasms, Abdominal Neoplasm, Excluding Pancreas NeoplasmArms22G Franseen Needle Group, 22G Adapt Needle Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prospective randomized study comparing Franseen 22-gaugeWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsyEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bojan KovacevicGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Anders ToxværdDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Pia KlausenGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Michael H LarsenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Simon GrützmeierGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Sönke DetlefsenDepartment of Pathology and Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
John Gásdal KarstensenGastro Unit, Pancreatitis Centre East, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Lene BrinkGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Hazem HassanGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Estrid HøgdallDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter VilmannGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Several types of needles are available for EUS-guided tissue sampling of pancreatic lesions. Whereas fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needles typically provide cytological samples, fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are designed to obtain microcores with preserved tissue architecture. The aim of this study was to compare tissue amount and diagnostic yield between a modified Franseen-type FNB needle (TopGain; Medi-Globe GmbH, Grassau, Germany) and a standard FNA needle. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled study between June 2020 and September 2021, including patients with a solid pancreatic lesion referred for EUS-guided tissue sampling at 3 centers in Denmark. The patients were randomized 1:1 to either FNA needle or the novel FNB needle. Primary outcomes included the number of obtained tissue microcores and total and diagnostic tissue area. Results: Sixty-four patients were included. The median number of tissue microcores procured per pass was significantly higher in the FNB group compared with FNA (3 Conclusions: The novel Franseen-type FNB needle seems to be significantly superior to a conventional FNA needle. The results of this study underline excellent performance of crown-cut needles.

Indexed as

Biopsy, fine-needleBiopsy, large-core needleEUS-FNAImage-guided biopsyPancreatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37693112
PMCPMC10437204
OpenAlexW4386591796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.