Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693078›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2022

Current trends on the application of artificial intelligence in medical sciences.

Aisha Mousa Mashraqi, Budoor Allehyani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aisha Mousa MashraqiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, UAE.
Budoor AllehyaniDepartment of Information System, College of Computers and Information Systems, Umm Al-Qura University, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is expanding with colossal applications in various sectors. In the healthcare sector, it is booming to make life simpler with utmost accuracy by predicting, diagnosing and up to care with the help of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) applications. Modern computer algorithms have attained accuracy levels comparable to those of human specialists in medical sciences, although computers often do jobs more quickly than people do. It is also expected that there will not be a mandate for humans to be present for the jobs that machines can do, and it is gaining the highest peak because of good trained artificial models in the medical field. ML enhances the therapeutic process and improves health by encouraging more patient participation. ML may get more accurate patient data when used with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and automate message notifications that prompt patients to respond at certain times. The motivation behind this article is to make a comprehensive review of the on-going implementation of ML in medical science, what challenges it is facing now, and how it can be simplified for future researchers to contribute better to medical sciences while applying it to the practitioners' jobs easier. In this review, we have extensively mined the data and brought up systematised applications of AI in healthcare, what challenges have been faced by the experts, and what ethical responsibilities are liable to them while taking the data. We also tabulated which algorithms will be helpful for what kind of data and disease conditions will be useful for future researchers and developers. This article will provide a better insight into AI and ML for the beginner to the advanced developer and researcher to understand the concepts from the basics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDisease DiagnosisDrug repurposingMachine LearningMedical Imaging

Identifiers

PMID37693078
PMCPMC10484692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.