ReviewBioinformation2022
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and human diseases.
Review in Bioinformation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- PCSK9 in bridging metabolism and neurodegeneration: a new paradigm for alzheimer's treatment.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- Clinical translation of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics in cancer and inherited genetic disorders.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Coloring target and off-target effects of genetically modified nucleases by blue & white colony assays.Biotechnology letters · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas-9 mediated genome editing has recently emerged as a potential and innovative technology in therapeutic development and biomedical research. Several recent studies have been performed to understand gene modification techniques in obtaining effective ex vivo results. Generally, the disease targets for gene correction will be in specific organs, so understanding the complete potential of genomic treatment methods is essential. From such a perspective, the present review revealed the significant importance of the CRISPR/ Cas9 delivery system. Both the promising gene-editing delivery systems, such as synthetic (non-viral) and viral vector systems are discussed in this review. In addition, this paper attempted to summarize the tissue-specific and organ-specific mRNA delivery systems that provide possible research information for future researchers. Further, the major challenges of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, such as off-target delivery, immunogenicity, and limited packaging, were also elucidated. Accordingly, this review illustrated a wide range of clinical applications associated with the efficient delivery of CRISPR/ Cas9 gene-editing. Moreover, this article emphasizes the role of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in treating Intra Cerebral haemorrhage (ICH), thereby suggesting future researchers to adopt more clinical trials on this breakthrough delivery system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.