ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023
Conventional versus reverse insertion of i-gel® in overweight and obese patients - Interventional randomised controlled trial.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical performance of i-gel and i-gel Plus for airway management of obese patients: A prospective randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Reviewing research reporting in randomised controlled trials: Confidence andIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Healthcare research data sharing and academic journal: A challenging but fruitful initiative.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The supraglottic airway device, i-gel, is used in obese patients for short- to medium-duration surgical procedures. Insertion techniques have contributed to the successful and proper placement of i-gel in the first attempt. This study aims to compare two techniques for successfully inserting i-gel in the first attempt in overweight and obese patients as measured by oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). Methods: This interventional, randomised, controlled study was conducted after ethical approval, and trial registration in overweight and obese patients. Patients were randomised into two groups: In Group C, the conventional technique was used, while in Group R, the reverse technique was used to insert i-gel. OLP, successful placement, required manipulations, time taken for insertion, number of attempts, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were studied. The collected data were analysed statistically. Results: The mean OLP (30.46 ± 3.76 vs. 32.12 ± 3.10 mmHg, Conclusion: The reverse technique significantly favoured the actual OL
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.