ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2023
[Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management and prognostic outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Sub-Saharan Africa: the central role of surgery in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014-2024).World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors versus leiomyomas by special stains.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: although rare, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. The aim of this work is to study the clinical, paraclinical, therapeutic and evolutionary features of GIST. Methods: we conducted a descriptive retrospective, monocentric study (April 2017-April 2021) collecting data from the medical records of all patients with GIST treated at the medical oncology department of the University Hospital of Mostaganem. Results: we collected data from the medical records of 23 patients, with a median age of 54.4 years, sex ratio 1.8, over a period of 4 years. Abdominal pain was the most frequent symptom (78.3%, n=18); 47.8% of patients (n=11) had a tumor in the small bowel. The diagnosis was made at an early stage in 69.6% of cases (n=16). Surgical treatment was performed in 20 of the 23 patients, 18 of whom with R0. Of the 15 operated patients with a localized tumor, 13 received adjuvant medical treatment (Imatinib). Disease progression was reported in three patients treated with imatinib, then 2 Conclusion: the diagnosis of GIST is mainly based on histology and immunohistochemistry, which is often not performed by our pathologists. Molecular biology makes it possible to predict the prognosis and consequently adapt the therapies. The outcome of patients with GIST is often favorable but marked by recurrences despite a supposedly curative treatment requiring prolonged monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.