ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Therapeutic effect of intravenous acyclovir in children with infectious mononucleosis and immune function.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application value of intravenous acyclovir in children with infectious mononucleosis (IM) and its effects on immune function.
methodsThe data of 136 children with IM treated in Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital from March 2019 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 98 children were selected. Among them, 45 children treated with routine ribavirin were assigned to the control group, and the other 53 children treated with intravenous acyclovir were enrolled into the observation group. The two groups were compared in terms of efficacy, incidence of adverse reactions, recovery time of clinical symptoms, and immune function indexes, IgG, IgA, IgM, white blood cell (WBC) count and lymphocyte proportion, before and 10 days after the treatment. Independent risk factors affecting efficacy were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsThe observation group showed a significantly higher overall response rate than the control group (P=0.025). The control group experienced significantly longer recovery time of body temperature returning to normal, cure time of isthmitis, time for lymph node reduction, and alleviation time of hepatomegaly than the observation group (P<0.05). Additionally, the control group presented with a significantly higher incidence of adverse reactions than the observation group (P=0.028). After treatment, the observation group showed significantly lower levels of IgG, IgA, IgM, WBC count and lymphocyte proportion than the control group (all P<0.010). Longer average course of disease (OR: 1.449, 95% CI: 1.095-1.918), higher admission temperature (OR: 6.996, 95% CI: 1.350-36.257), higher admission IgA level (OR: 4.735, 95% CI: 1.357-16.520) and higher admission IgG level (OR: 1.470, 95% CI: 1.012-2.134) were independent risk factors for ineffective efficacy, while acyclovir (OR: 0.058, 95% CI: 0.005-0.729) was an independent protective factor.
conclusionIn the treatment of IM, intravenous acyclovir can substantially improve the overall clinical response rate for patients, with less adverse reactions, and can greatly alleviate various clinical symptoms and signs including fever, isthmitis, cervical lymph node enlargement, and hepatosplenomegaly, with obvious regulating effects on the immune function, so it is worth popularizing and applying in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37692931PMC10492057W4386593466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.