Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692857›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Potential diagnostic value of quantitative superb microvascular imaging in premalignant and malignant cervical lesions.

Yi Zhu, Yixin Tang, Zhuolin Jiang, Jie Zhang, Shijun Jia, Yanjie Li, Xinyi Luo, Tomoyasu Kato, Guonan Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi ZhuOutpatient Department (Ultrasound), Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Yixin TangDepartment of Ultrasound, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China.
Zhuolin JiangOutpatient Department (Ultrasound), Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment Gynecological Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Shijun JiaDepartment Pathology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Yanjie LiOutpatient Department (Ultrasound), Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Xinyi LuoOutpatient Department (Ultrasound), Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Tomoyasu KatoDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Guonan ZhangDepartment Gynecological Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Cancer Hospital · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNChengdu Medical College · CNSuizhou Central Hospital · CNTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the vascular index (VI) on superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in distinguishing normal uterine cervical epithelium, high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and cervical cancer. Methods: The retrospective study included women with pathology-confirmed CIN or cervical cancer, who underwent transvaginal ultrasound and SMI between April 2021 and October 2022. The SIM manifestations of normal cervix and cervical lesions were reviewed. SIM were measured and converted into vascular index (VI) which compared between cervical lesions and control groups. We have retrospectively compared ultrasound features of cervical lesions and characteristics of patients. Measurement reliability was evaluated by intra class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 235 consecutive females were enrolled, comprising 38 with high-grade CIN, 96 with cervical cancer, and 101 with a normal uterine cervix. The microvascular architecture exhibited significant variations between premalignant and malignant cervical lesions. Branch-like patterns were predominantly observed in high-grade CIN, while crab claw-like and fireball-like patterns were more commonly associated with cervical cancer. The median VI of cervical cancer (34.7 ± 10.3) was significantly higher than that of high-grade CIN (17.6 ± 4.2) (P < 0.001). Moreover, the VI values of cervical cancer differed significantly among different FIGO stages and pathological types (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). The VI demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for cervical lesions compared to vascular patterns (AUC = 0.974 and 0.969, respectively). Using a cut-off value of 25.5, the VI yielded a sensitivity of 82.3% and a specificity of 99.3% for cervical lesion detection. Conclusions: The SMI parameter (VI) exhibited a significantly higher value in cervical cancer compared to high-grade CIN, with a high level of agreement among observers. These findings suggest that quantitative SMI holds promise as an imaging technique for the detection and characterization of cervical lesions.

Indexed as

cervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasmssuperb microvascular imagingtransvaginal ultrasoundvascularity index

Identifiers

PMID37692857
PMCPMC10492516
OpenAlexW4386168468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.