ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Patient-reported outcomes and functional exercise capacity in a real-life setting in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy: the Lung PLUS study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical recommendations for exercise and nutrition in patients with lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients receiving lung cancer radiotherapy: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To better understand the impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and its treatment-related toxicity on early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) patients, we conducted the Lung PLUS study in a real-world setting. Methods: This is a monocentric prospective longitudinal study up to 12 months post-treatment, evaluating clinician- and patient-reported toxicity (resp. CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13), activities of daily living (HAQ-DI) and functional exercise capacity (6 Minute Walking Test (6MWT)). A mixed model approach was applied to analyze the data. Results: At baseline, clinicians and patients (n=51) reported mostly fatigue (63% vs 79%), cough (49% vs 75%) and dyspnea (65% vs 73%) of any grade. Dyspnea (p=.041) increased over time. Meaningful clinical improvements were particularly seen in pain, fatigue, and cough. Clinician reported clinically meaningful improvements and deteriorations over time in fatigue, cough, and dyspnea. Almost at every timepoint, more people reported deterioration to the clinician than improvement in aforementioned toxicities. Overall HRQoL (p=.014), physical (p=.011) and emotional (p<.001) functioning improved over time. At baseline, patients had a moderate daily functioning score and walked an average distance of 360 meters. No statistically significant differences were found in daily functioning and exercise capacity over time. Conclusion: Our study showed an increase in patient-reported toxicity and dyspnea, without impacting functional status, following SBRT. Overall HRQoL, physical and emotional functioning improved over time. Understanding the impact of treatment on patient-reported outcomes is crucial to identify the needs/problems of patients to enhance their HRQoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.