ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Multi-phase-combined CECT radiomics models for Fuhrman grade prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Machine Learning Models Based on Medical Imaging in Predicting Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Non-invasive prediction of nuclear grade in renal cell carcinoma using CT-Based radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- State of the art review of AI in renal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- The interpretable CT-based vision transformer model for preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma SSIGN score and outcome.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Prediction of Pathologic T3a Upstaging in Clinical T1 RCC.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-phase-combined contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) radiomics methods for noninvasive Fuhrman grade prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods: A total of 187 patients with four-phase CECT images were retrospectively enrolled and then were categorized into training cohort (n=126) and testing cohort (n=61). All patients were confirmed as ccRCC by histopathological reports. A total of 110 3D classical radiomics features were extracted from each phase of CECT for individual ccRCC lesion, and contrast-enhanced variation features were also calculated as derived radiomics features. These features were concatenated together, and redundant features were removed by Pearson correlation analysis. The discriminative features were selected by minimum redundancy maximum relevance method (mRMR) and then input into a C-support vector classifier to build multi-phase-combined CECT radiomics models. The prediction performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Results: The multi-phase-combined CECT radiomics model showed the best prediction performance (AUC=0.777) than the single-phase CECT radiomics model (AUC=0.711) in the testing cohort ( Conclusion: The multi-phase-combined CECT radiomics model is a potential effective way to noninvasively predict Fuhrman grade of ccRCC. The concatenation of first-order features and texture features extracted from corticomedullary phase and nephrographic phase are discriminative feature representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.