Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692708›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Comparison of Early and Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jithin Karedath, Sumreen Nazly, Syeda Fatima Murtaza, Sagar Bhandari, Anmol Sharma, Saifullah Talpur, Muhammad Moiz Vistro, Sujith K Palleti

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Jithin KaredathInternal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Sumreen NazlyInternal Medicine, University Medical and Dental College Faisalabad, Faisalabad, PAK.
Syeda Fatima MurtazaInternal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
Sagar BhandariCardiology, Tucson Medical Center, Tucson, USA.
Anmol SharmaInternal Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, NPL.
Saifullah TalpurPsychiatry, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Muhammad Moiz VistroInternal Medicine, United Medical and Dental College, Creek General Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Sujith K PalletiNephrology, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, USA.
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPJacksonville College · USKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLoyola University Medical Center · USPunjab Medical College · PKTucson Medical Center · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare early and long-term mortality in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (EF) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Two investigators independently conducted a systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to July 15, 2023, using the search terms "reduced ejection fraction," "preserved ejection fraction," "coronary artery bypass surgery," and "mortality." Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used with medical subject heading (MeSH) terms to refine the search. The reference lists of all included articles were manually searched to identify potentially relevant studies. We restricted our search to studies published in the English language. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included short-term mortality (including in-hospital and 30-day mortality) and long-term mortality. A total of five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sample size is 94,399 participants. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of early mortality was significantly higher in patients with reduced EF compared to patients with preserved EF (risk ratio, RR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.50 to 3.06). The pooled analysis also reported that late mortality was significantly higher in patients with reduced EF compared to patients with preserved EF (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.08). The pooled analysis of studies demonstrated a significantly higher rate of both early and late mortality in patients with reduced EF, emphasizing the importance of EF assessment in risk stratification for CABG patients.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass grafting(cabg)mortalitynormal ejection fractionreduced ejection fractionsystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37692708
PMCPMC10491923
OpenAlexW4385738956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.