ArticleCureus2023
Case Report and Literature Review: Lumbar Disc Extrusion Misdiagnosed as an Epidural Hematoma.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thoracic root-related intradural extramedullary cavernoma presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate differentiation between epidural hematomas and lumbar disc extrusion is essential due to the potential overlap in clinical presentations. We present a case report highlighting a significant challenge in which a massive lumbar disc extrusion was mistaken for an epidural hematoma. This is a case report of a 38-year-old male patient who developed cauda equina syndrome four days after experiencing an audible cracking in the lower back during weightlifting activity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was inconclusive, unable to distinguish between an extruded nucleus pulposus and a spinal epidural hematoma. Subsequently, an urgent operation revealed a large herniated disc at the L4-L5 level, ruling out any hematoma. The patient's post-operative follow-up showed significant improvement, with almost complete recovery of motor and sensory functions. This case emphasizes the challenges faced when distinguishing between epidural hematomas and lumbar disc herniations, particularly on MRI. The lumbar disc herniation's substantial size, cranial and caudal migration on multiple levels, and signal intensity contributed to the misdiagnosis, underscoring the importance of careful interpretation and awareness of such complexities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.