ReviewCureus2023
Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "First, do no harm" in the digital era: examining the practicality of the European Health Data Space proposal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Application of deep learning technology in breast cancer: a systematic review of segmentation, detection, and classification approaches.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education, training and research: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Guideline
- [Medical education and artificial intelligence: perspectives and ethical challenges].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Pooled it
- Revolution or routine? Comparing AI and traditional imaging in thoracic surgery outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Examining inclusivity: the use of AI and diverse populations in health and social care: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Physicians' required competencies in AI-assisted clinical settings: a systematic review.British medical bulletin · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Malnutrition: A Systematic Literature Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Pooled it
- Applications of large language models in psychiatry: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic survey on the application of federated learning in mental state detection and human activity recognition.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Pooled it
- Perspectives of Patients Regarding Artificial Intelligence and Its Application in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Ethical and Governance Challenges of AI in Medical Imaging and Diagnostics: A Systematic Survey and Policy Framework Recommendations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Attitudes and Needs of Health Care Providers Toward Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Pediatric Palliative Care: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Patients prefer ChatGPT to institutional websites for questions on radiation-based imaging exams: international mixed-methods study.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- Perceptions of Intensive Care Nurses Toward Artificial Intelligence Technologies: A Qualitative Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Airway Management: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- Assessing multiple chatGPT versions on novel content in the Taiwan urology board examination: accuracy, speed, and domain-specific performance.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- iS2C2: a cointelligent platform for mechanistic discovery of disease cellular crosstalk.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare promises groundbreaking advancements in patient care, revolutionizing clinical diagnosis, predictive medicine, and decision-making. This transformative technology uses machine learning, natural language processing, and large language models (LLMs) to process and reason like human intelligence. OpenAI's ChatGPT, a sophisticated LLM, holds immense potential in medical practice, research, and education. However, as AI in healthcare gains momentum, it brings forth profound ethical challenges that demand careful consideration. This comprehensive review explores key ethical concerns in the domain, including privacy, transparency, trust, responsibility, bias, and data quality. Protecting patient privacy in data-driven healthcare is crucial, with potential implications for psychological well-being and data sharing. Strategies like homomorphic encryption (HE) and secure multiparty computation (SMPC) are vital to preserving confidentiality. Transparency and trustworthiness of AI systems are essential, particularly in high-risk decision-making scenarios. Explainable AI (XAI) emerges as a critical aspect, ensuring a clear understanding of AI-generated predictions. Cybersecurity becomes a pressing concern as AI's complexity creates vulnerabilities for potential breaches. Determining responsibility in AI-driven outcomes raises important questions, with debates on AI's moral agency and human accountability. Shifting from data ownership to data stewardship enables responsible data management in compliance with regulations. Addressing bias in healthcare data is crucial to avoid AI-driven inequities. Biases present in data collection and algorithm development can perpetuate healthcare disparities. A public-health approach is advocated to address inequalities and promote diversity in AI research and the workforce. Maintaining data quality is imperative in AI applications, with convolutional neural networks showing promise in multi-input/mixed data models, offering a comprehensive patient perspective. In this ever-evolving landscape, it is imperative to adopt a multidimensional approach involving policymakers, developers, healthcare practitioners, and patients to mitigate ethical concerns. By understanding and addressing these challenges, we can harness the full potential of AI in healthcare while ensuring ethical and equitable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.