Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692586›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Efficacy of Additional Corticosteroids After Dexamethasone Treatment for Moderate to Severe COVID-19: An Observational Study.

Yosuke Fukuda, Kaoru Mochizuki, Miharu Ijichi, Tetsuya Homma, Akihiko Tanaka, Hironori Sagara

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COVID-19 Pandemic: Therapeutic Strategies and Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yosuke FukudaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Yamanashi Red Cross Hospital, Fujikawaguchiko-machi, JPN.
Kaoru MochizukiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Miharu IjichiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Tetsuya HommaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Akihiko TanakaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Hironori SagaraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Showa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Previous studies have demonstrated dexamethasone (DEX)'s efficacy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In contrast, patients with residual lung field shading and symptoms after DEX treatment have been observed, and the efficacy of additional corticosteroids (AC) is unknown. Objectives We aimed to investigate the efficacy of AC in patients with COVID-19 with residual respiratory symptoms or who required oxygen therapy or invasive mechanical ventilation after DEX treatment. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective observational study including 261 patients with community-onset COVID-19, aged ≥ 18 years, admitted to our hospital between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021. Finally, 34 patients were included in the study who met all four of the following criteria: (1) required oxygen therapy or invasive ventilation, (2) were treated with DEX, (3) had residual shading on chest imaging after DEX treatment, or (4) had unimproved respiratory symptoms or oxygen saturation < 90%. We reviewed the medical records and clinical courses of 14 patients who received AC therapy (AC group) and 20 patients who did not (non-additional corticosteroids or NC group). Results The 90-day mortality rate was 35.7% in the AC group and 25.0% in the NC group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.797). In addition, there was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who required oxygen therapy at discharge (64% vs. 35%, p = 0.162). The time from the end of DEX therapy to discharge was significantly longer in the AC group (median 7.5 vs. 33 days, p = 0.019). Regarding serious adverse events, infection was statistically more common in the AC group than in the NC group (p = 0.005). Conclusions AC after DEX treatment does not improve clinical outcomes and may prolong hospital stay.

Indexed as

acute hypoxemic respiratory failurecorticosteroids in covid-19covid-19organizing pneumoniasars-cov-2

Identifiers

PMID37692586
PMCPMC10487281
OpenAlexW4385705652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.