Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692545›Full record

ReviewTranslational pediatrics2023

Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of lower urinary tract in children: a narrative review on technical aspects and current literature.

Anand Upasani, Arianna Mariotto, Waleed Eassa, Ramnath Subramaniam

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anand UpasaniPaediatric Urology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Arianna MariottoPaediatric Urology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Waleed EassaPaediatric Urology Center, Sabah Al Ahmad Urology Center, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Ramnath SubramaniamPaediatric Urology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBAl-Sabah Hospital · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Robotic approach is used widely for paediatric upper tract urinary reconstruction. This is a narrative review looking at the current status of robotic approach in lower urinary tract reconstruction. The aim of this article is to highlight the important technical aspects of commonly performed robotic lower urinary tract reconstructive surgeries and review the current literature. Methods: MEDLINE database search was conducted using MeSH terms and Boolean operators from Jan 2000 to Jun 2022. Abstracts were screened to exclude those in languages other than English as also articles pertaining to (I) upper urinary tract surgery, (II) only laparoscopic surgery (not robot-assisted) and (III) non-urological topics. Selected articles were then reviewed and search expanded to include their references with a focus on advanced lower urinary tract reconstruction. Key Content and Findings: The technical aspects of robotic ureteric reimplantation, continent catheterisable channel and autoaugmentation are discussed in detail. The early outcomes are comparable to open surgery. The true advantage of robotic approach becomes apparent when performing lower urinary tract reconstruction, where space in the pelvis is limited and access is challenging. Only a few centres are currently performing bladder neck surgery and bladder augmentation. Conclusions: Robotic lower urinary tract reconstruction in children is feasible and safe. Robotic approach offers better access, especially in the limited space within the pelvis. It reduces blood loss and post-operative pain allowing early recovery and discharge. Long-term follow-up with increasing experience could further validate these early observations.

Indexed as

lower urinary tract reconstructionpaediatric urologyRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37692545
PMCPMC10485640
OpenAlexW4386201583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.