Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692456›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2023

Pediatric procedural sedation in African clinical settings: A mixed methods study of African providers' sedation practices.

Megan L Schultz, Andrew Melby, Rebecca Gray, Faye M Evans, Sarah Benett, Michelle L Niescierenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2023.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan L SchultzDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Andrew MelbyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Rebecca GrayDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-Operative Medicine, Division of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Faye M EvansDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah BenettDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michelle L NiescierenkoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the practice of pediatric procedural sedation in Africa, despite being incredibly useful to the emergency care of children. This study describes the clinical experiences of African medical providers who use pediatric procedural sedation, including clinical indications, medications, adverse events, training, clinical guideline use, and comfort level. The goals of this study are to describe pediatric sedation practices in resource-limited settings in Africa and identify potential barriers to the provision of safe pediatric sedation. Methods: This mixed methods study describes the pediatric procedural sedation practices of African providers using semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to identify key informants working in African resource-limited settings across a broad geographic, economic, and professional range. Quantitative data about provider background and sedation practices were collected concurrently with qualitative data about perceived barriers to pediatric procedural sedation and suggestions to improve the practice of pediatric sedation in their settings. All interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for major themes. Results: Thirty-eight key informants participated, representing 19 countries and the specialties of Anesthesia, Surgery, Pediatrics, Critical Care, Emergency Medicine, and General Practice. The most common indication for pediatric sedation was imaging (42%), the most common medication used was ketamine (92%), and hypoxia was the most common adverse event (61%). Despite 92% of key informants stating that pediatric procedural sedation was critical to their practice, only half reported feeling adequately trained. The three major qualitative themes regarding barriers to safe pediatric sedation in their settings were: lack of resources, lack of education, and lack of standardization across sites and providers. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that training specialized pediatric sedation teams, creating portable "pediatric sedation kits," and producing locally relevant pediatric sedation guidelines may help reduce current barriers to the provision of safe pediatric sedation in resource-limited African settings.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPediatricProcedural sedationResource-limited

Identifiers

PMID37692456
PMCPMC10491935
OpenAlexW4384103259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.