Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692358›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2023

Investigation of simultaneous volatile organic compound removal by indoor plants using solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Geoffrey Peterson, Timothy Jones, Diana Rispoli, Shokouh Haddadi, Vadoud Niri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phytoremediation of formaldehyde by the stems of Epipremnum aureum and Rohdea japonica.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey PetersonDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Oswego Oswego NY 13126 USA vadoud.niri@oswego.edu.
Timothy JonesDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Oswego Oswego NY 13126 USA vadoud.niri@oswego.edu.
Diana RispoliDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Oswego Oswego NY 13126 USA vadoud.niri@oswego.edu.
Shokouh HaddadiDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Oswego Oswego NY 13126 USA vadoud.niri@oswego.edu.
Vadoud NiriDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Oswego Oswego NY 13126 USA vadoud.niri@oswego.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-7706
State University of New York at Oswego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are significant indoor air pollutants, and employing plants offers a simple and cost-effective approach to reduce their concentration. It is important to determine which plant exhibits greater efficiency in removing specific VOCs. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of various common indoor plants in simultaneously removing multiple hazardous VOCs. A sealed chamber was utilized to expose five different species of houseplants to eight commonly found VOCs. The concentrations of each compound were monitored over an extended period using solid phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The study determined and reported the efficiency of removal per leaf area for all compounds by each plant under different conditions, including removal by the entire plant (with and without light) and removal by the plant's leaf area. The paper discusses the efficiency and rate of removal of each VOC for the tested plants, namely

Identifiers

PMID37692358
PMCPMC10483372
OpenAlexW4386509866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.