ArticleNew microbes and new infections2023
Detection of
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Bartonella spp. infections in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of Razi Institute · 2025Pooled it
- Between insects and birds: molecular evidence of Bartonella henselae DNA in Rhodnius prolixus (Stål, 1859) from an insectary and Cairina moschata (Linnaeus, 1758) ducks used as triatomine blood meal source.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic comparison analysis across seven developmental stages of the Triatoma rubrofasciata, a vector of Chagas disease.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Detection of Bartonella henselae DNA in Triatoma sordida collected in peridomiciliary environments.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The blood-feeding behavior of kissing bugs (subfamily Triatominae, family Reduviidae, order Hemiptera) means they are potential vectors of multiple humans pathogens. However, investigations of vector-borne pathogens harbored by kissing bugs are rare. Methods: In the current study, 22 adult kissing bugs ( Results: All the kissing bugs were negative for Anaplasmataceae bacteria, Conclusions: We report the detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.