Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692289›Full record

ReviewNew microbes and new infections2023

A systematic review and meta-analysis of bovine brucellosis seroprevalence in Latin America and the Caribbean.

D Katterine Bonilla-Aldana, Adrián Esteban Trejos-Mendoza, Soffia Pérez-Vargas, Estefany Rivera-Casas, Fausto Muñoz-Lara, Lysien I Zambrano, Kovy Arteaga-Livias, Juan R Ulloque-Badaracco, Esteban A Alarcon-Braga, Enrique A Hernandez-Bustamante and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in New microbes and new infections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A first insight into seropositivity and risk factors forOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

D Katterine Bonilla-AldanaResearch Unit, Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Peru.
Adrián Esteban Trejos-MendozaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas-Institución Universitaria Visión de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Soffia Pérez-VargasFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas-Institución Universitaria Visión de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Estefany Rivera-CasasFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas-Institución Universitaria Visión de las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Fausto Muñoz-LaraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (FCM), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras (UNAH), Tegucigalpa DC, Honduras.
Lysien I ZambranoDepartment of Morphological Sciences, School of Medical, Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Kovy Arteaga-LiviasFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán, Huánuco, Peru.
Juan R Ulloque-BadaraccoFacultad de Ciencias de la Saud, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Esteban A Alarcon-BragaFacultad de Ciencias de la Saud, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Enrique A Hernandez-BustamanteGrupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
Ali Al-Kassab-CórdovaCentro de Excelencia en Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
Vicente A Benites-ZapataUnidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesMaster in Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bovine brucellosis is a significant public health problem in countries with economic and zoonotic implications. Although relevant, there are no previous systematic reviews about bovine brucellosis in Latin America. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review in five data-bases to assess the seroprevalence of Brucella in cattle. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). In addition, measures of heterogeneity (Cochran's Q statistic and I Results: The literature search yielded 3,403 articles, of which 65 studies were fully valid for analysis. The pooled seroprevalence for Brucella in bovine (n ​= ​46,883,177) was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.0%-5.0%; p ​< ​0.001), and Venezuela was the country with the highest prevalence (16.0%). By regions, the highest seroprevalence is in Central America and the Caribbean islands (8.0%,95%CI: 3.0%-15.0%; p ​< ​0.001, I Conclusions: Some countries reported still relevant seroprevalences of bovine brucellosis, especially at the Central America and Caribbean islands. Multiple factors may influence the survival and spread of pathogens in the environment; farms located in regions bordering forest areas, in areas of difficult access to the veterinary service; extensive beef herds raised at pastures with different age and productive groups inter-mingled, and minimal concerns regarding hygiene practices and disease prevention measures. Bovine brucellosis has not been eliminated and needs to be considered with new tools for prevention and control, especially being a zoonosis.

Indexed as

BrucellosisCattleMeta-analysisSeroprevalenceSystematic reviewZoonotic

Identifiers

PMID37692289
PMCPMC10492193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.