Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692124›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Assessing the impact of the 2018 tetanus guidelines on knowledge and practices of emergency physicians in trauma patients: a national survey study.

Junling Gao, Xiaxia Yu, Guanghui Cao, Xiaoming He, Pingde Zhang, Joseph Walline, Yuanxi Wang, Xingjuan Yu, Jun Xu, Thuan-Quoc Thach and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global under- and overprescribing of drugs-a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Chinese expert consensus on tetanus prophylaxis in major trauma (2026 Edition).Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Junling Gao *Buddhist Practices and Counselling Science Lab, Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiaxia Yu *School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Guanghui CaoEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoming HeDepartment of Neurology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Pingde ZhangDepartment of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Joseph WallineAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yuanxi WangDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Interventional Surgery, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xingjuan YuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China.
Jun XuEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Thuan-Quoc ThachDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-3888
Yong LiuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNShenzhen University Health Science Center · CNSouthern Medical University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHubei University of Arts and Science · CNSouthern Medical University Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tetanus remains a significant public health issue in China, with the approach of anti-tetanus prophylaxis in the emergency department resulting in both overuse, particularly of human tetanus immune globulin (TIG), and underuse with the tetanus vaccine. This is largely due to the absence of updated guidelines on tetanus prophylaxis before 2018. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of the 2018 Chinese tetanus guidelines on the knowledge and practices of emergency physicians about tetanus prevention in trauma patients. Methods: From November 2019 to April 2020, we conducted a web-based survey involving 499 emergency physicians. The survey included a questionnaire covering knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to tetanus. We assessed the influence of the 2018 tetanus guidelines on the knowledge and practices of emergency physicians related to tetanus prevention for patients with trauma using multiple regression analysis. Results: The survey results showed that only 45.3% of the participants had received formal training on tetanus immunization, despite 53.3% reporting the availability of tetanus vaccines at their institutions. Physicians typically prescribed tetanus antitoxin or human TIG instead of tetanus toxoid (TT) to treat injuries, regardless of the patient's TT vaccination history. Among the respondents, those who were aware of the 2018 tetanus guidelines had higher mean scores on the general knowledge, risk knowledge, and treatment knowledge scales, with increases of 6%, 13%, and 9%, respectively, compared to those who were unaware of the guidelines. Awareness of the 2018 tetanus guidelines was associated with a high level of knowledge, as indicated by the general knowledge score, recommendation knowledge score, and total knowledge score, after adjusting for the effects of all variables on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the participants. A high level of education was also associated with a high level of knowledge indicated by the recommendation knowledge score and total knowledge score. Conclusions: Our study highlights a substantial gap in the attitudes, knowledge, and practices of emergency physicians in China regarding tetanus immunization. The results suggest an urgent need to promote the Chinese Expert Consensus Guidelines on tetanus to improve emergency physicians' knowledge and competence in tetanus prophylaxis. The findings underscore the importance of enhancing physicians' awareness of the latest guidelines to ensure appropriate and effective treatment for patients with tetanus-prone injuries.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicinePhysiciansTetanusTetanus AntitoxinTetanus ToxoidWounds and InjuriesAsian PeopleChinaEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicTetanus AntitoxinTetanus ToxoidCECGChinese Expert Consensus GuidelinesKnowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP)TetanusTetanus toxoid

Identifiers

PMID37692124
PMCPMC10484204
OpenAlexW4386420472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.