ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2023
The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Destructive Assessment of Dentin Composite Bond Integrity using Laser Speckle Imaging and Machine Learning Regression.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Orthodontics, Dental Trauma, Restorative Dentistry, and Endodontics: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Universal Adhesive Brands Functional Performance in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: 18- to 48-Months Systematic Clinical Report.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Development of multifunctional dental adhesive with 4-formylphenyl acrylate and nano-silver.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Microshear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Potassium Nitrate-Modified Polycarboxylate Cement at Two Time Points Using Different Adhesive Approaches: An In Vitro Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Bonding and fractographic characterization of universal adhesives applied to dentin in multimode strategies: an in vitro study.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
- Does simplification signify compromise? Evaluation of different universal adhesives on shear bond strength:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative effects of plasma activation and monomer infiltration on the surface characteristics and wettability of 3D-printed permanent crown resin.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Antibacterial Dental Adhesive Containing Cetylpyridinium Chloride Montmorillonite.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Current trends in placing posterior composite restorations: Perspectives from Palestinian general dentists: A questionnair study.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
- Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Composites: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adhesive agents are essential to most restorative procedures used in everyday practice. Depending on the clinical situation, the dentist will choose among a rapidly evolving variety of adhesive agents (bonding agents). Due to the availability of many adhesive agents, appropriate selection can take time and effort. Typically, a practitioner relies more on marketing and experience than in-depth material knowledge. The classification of adhesive agents may need to be clarified and easier to remember due to its lack of relevance to clinical procedures. This paper reviews the published literature retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus by using specific keywords "adhesive agents", "classification", "dentin", "enamel", "universal", "self-etch", "etch-and-rinse", and "bonding". The titles and abstracts were screened, and the relevant literature was retrieved. The list of references from each identified article was examined to find other potentially relevant articles. Adhesive agents can be classified as etch-and-rinse, self-etch, or "multi-mode" according to their approach to interacting with the smear layer, and each approach can be further classified according to the number of clinical steps required during application. This article reviews the classification of current adhesive agents and discusses the properties that make a specific adhesive agent the optimal choice for a particular clinical indication. The review will assist the general dentist in understanding the various types of available adhesive agents and how they function. Overall, the review will facilitate decision-making and allow the selection of appropriate materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.