ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Patch-wise 3D segmentation quality assessment combining reconstruction and regression networks.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking deep learning in bioimaging through a data centric lens.Npj imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: General deep-learning (DL)-based semantic segmentation methods with expert level accuracy may fail in 3D medical image segmentation due to complex tissue structures, lack of large datasets with ground truth, etc. For expeditious diagnosis, there is a compelling need to predict segmentation quality without ground truth. In some medical imaging applications, maintaining the quality of segmentation is crucial to the localized regions where disease is prevalent rather than just globally maintaining high-average segmentation quality. We propose a DL framework to identify regions of segmentation inaccuracies by combining a 3D generative adversarial network (GAN) and a convolutional regression network. Approach: Our approach is methodologically based on the learned ability to reconstruct the original images identifying the regions of location-specific segmentation failures, in which the reconstruction does not match the underlying original image. We use conditional GAN to reconstruct input images masked by the segmentation results. The regression network is trained to predict the patch-wise Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conditioned on the segmentation results. The method relies directly on the extracted segmentation related features and does not need to use ground truth during the inference phase to identify erroneous regions in the computed segmentation. Results: We evaluated the proposed method on two public datasets: osteoarthritis initiative 4D (3D + time) knee MRI (knee-MR) and 3D non-small cell lung cancer CT (lung-CT). For the patch-wise DSC prediction, we observed the mean absolute errors of 0.01 and 0.04 with the independent standard for the knee-MR and lung-CT data, respectively. Conclusions: This method shows promising results in localizing the erroneous segmentation regions that may aid the downstream analysis of disease diagnosis and prognosis prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.