Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37692078›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

The quality of prison primary care: cross-sectional cluster-level analyses of prison healthcare data in the North of England.

Kate McLintock, Robbie Foy, Krysia Canvin, Sue Bellass, Philippa Hearty, Nat Wright, Marie Cunningham, Nicola Seanor, Laura Sheard, Tracey Farragher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Critical illness in prisons: a multi-methods analysis of reported healthcare safety incidents in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kate McLintockLeeds Institute of Health Sciences (LIHS), University of Leeds, Level 10, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Robbie FoyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences (LIHS), University of Leeds, Level 10, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Krysia CanvinSchool of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Sue BellassFaculty of Science and Engineering, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, 99 Oxford Road, Manchester, M1 7EL, UK.
Philippa HeartySpectrum Community Health CIC, Hebble Wharf, Wakefield, WF1 5RH, UK.
Nat WrightSpectrum Community Health CIC, Hebble Wharf, Wakefield, WF1 5RH, UK.
Marie CunninghamNorth of England Commissioning Support (NECS), John Snow House, Durham, DH1 3YG, UK.
Nicola SeanorNorth of England Commissioning Support (NECS), John Snow House, Durham, DH1 3YG, UK.
Laura SheardDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Tracey FarragherDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Room 2.544, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
North Staffordshire Clinical Commissioning Group · GBSpectrum Community Health CIC · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBKeele University · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prisoners have significant health needs, are relatively high users of healthcare, and often die prematurely. Strong primary care systems are associated with better population health outcomes. We investigated the quality of primary care delivered to prisoners. Methods: We assessed achievement against 30 quality indicators spanning different domains of care in 13 prisons in the North of England. We conducted repeated cross-sectional analyses of routinely recorded data from electronic health records over 2017-20. Multi-level mixed effects logistic regression models explored associations between indicator achievement and prison and prisoner characteristics. Findings: Achievement varied markedly between indicators, prisons and over time. Achieved processes of care ranged from 1% for annual epilepsy reviews to 94% for blood pressure checks in diabetes. Intermediate outcomes of care ranged from only 0.2% of people with epilepsy being seizure-free in the preceding year to 34% with diabetes having sufficient blood pressure control. Achievement improved over three years for 11 indicators and worsened for six, including declining antipsychotic monitoring and rising opioid prescribing. Achievement varied between prisons, e.g., 1.93-fold for gabapentinoid prescribing without coded neuropathic pain (odds ratio [OR] range 0.67-1.29) and 169-fold for dried blood spot testing (OR range 0.05-8.45). Shorter lengths of stay were frequently associated with lower achievement. Ethnicity was associated with some indicators achievement, although the associations differed (both positive and negative) with indicators. Interpretation: We found substantial scope for improvement and marked variations in quality, which were largely unaltered after adjustment for prison and prisoner characteristics. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health and Social Care and Delivery Research Programme: 17/05/26.

Indexed as

InequalitiesPrimary health carePrisonsQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID37692078
PMCPMC10484963
OpenAlexW4386315477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.