ArticleJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
Article in Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolite characterization and in vitro antiplasmodial potential assessment of Sonchus arvensis L. callus under glutamine treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel Anthranilic Acid Hybrids-An Alternative Weapon against Inflammatory Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A series of eight novels' 1,3-diazetidin-2-ones have been proposed to assess their potential activities. They are intended to examine antiproliferative effects through inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression. These eight compounds strongly interact with the EGFR protein, responsible for the activity. As part of a present study, these compounds were docked to the crystal structure of the EGFR (Protein Data Bank code: 1 M17) to determine their binding affinity at the active site. Based on computer predictions, two compounds were demonstrated high scores of 80.80 and 85.89. After analyzing ADME properties, these compounds were found to have significant potential for binding. Consequently, the abilities of gefitinib, erlotinib, imatinib, and sorafenib were selected for comparison as controls. Computational methods were performed to predict the critical disposition of eight novels' 1,3-diazetidin-2-one derivatives to the EGFR. Moreover, a docking technique employing the Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking program was conducted. Compounds 2 and 7 demonstrate a high docking peace-wise scoring function (PLP) fitness of 85.89 and 80.80, respectively. They fulfilled the Lipinski's rule, topological descriptors, and fingerprints of drug-like molecular structure keys. These compounds can be used as lead compounds to develop novel antiproliferative agents. The outcome of applying this study is novel series of 1,3-diazetidin-2-one compounds as new analogs were designed and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity with a higher potency profile and binding affinity within the active sites of EGFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.