ArticleStatistics in biosciences2023
Evaluating Dynamic Discrimination Performance of Risk Prediction Models for Survival Outcomes.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-driven survival prediction in pan-cancer studies by integrating multimodal histology-genomic data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Risk prediction models for survival outcomes are widely applied in medical research to predict future risk for the occurrence of the event. In many clinical studies, the biomarker data are measured repeatedly over time. To facilitate timely disease prognosis and decision making, many dynamic prediction models have been developed and generate predictions on a real-time basis. As a dynamic prediction model updates an individual's risk prediction over time based on new measurements, it is often important to examine how well the model performs at different measurement times and prediction times. In this article, we propose a two-dimensional area under curve (AUC) measure for dynamic prediction models and develop associated estimation and inference procedures. The estimation procedures are discussed under two types of biomarker measurement schedules: regular visits and irregular visits. The model parameters are estimated effectively by maximizing a pseudo-partial likelihood function. We apply the proposed method to a renal transplantation study to evaluate the discrimination performance of dynamic prediction models based on longitudinal biomarkers for graft failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.