Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37691895›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2023

Detection and classification of breast lesions using multiple information on contrast-enhanced mammography by a multiprocess deep-learning system: A multicenter study.

Yuqian Chen, Zhen Hua, Fan Lin, Tiantian Zheng, Heng Zhou, Shijie Zhang, Jing Gao, Zhongyi Wang, Huafei Shao, Wenjuan Li and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genomic spectra of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqian ChenSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Zhen HuaSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Fan LinDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Tiantian ZhengSchool of Medical Imaging, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China.
Heng ZhouSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Shijie ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Jing GaoDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Zhongyi WangDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Huafei ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Wenjuan LiDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Fengjie LiuDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Simin WangDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai 200433; China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, China.
Feng ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Hao LiuYizhun Medical AI Co. Ltd., Beijing 100080, China.
Haizhu XieDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Heng MaDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Haicheng ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Ning MaoDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Shandong Institute of Business and Technology · CNBinzhou University · CNGuangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Accurate detection and classification of breast lesions in early stage is crucial to timely formulate effective treatments for patients. We aim to develop a fully automatic system to detect and classify breast lesions using multiple contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images. Methods: In this study, a total of 1,903 females who underwent CEM examination from three hospitals were enrolled as the training set, internal testing set, pooled external testing set and prospective testing set. Here we developed a CEM-based multiprocess detection and classification system (MDCS) to perform the task of detection and classification of breast lesions. In this system, we introduced an innovative auxiliary feature fusion (AFF) algorithm that could intelligently incorporates multiple types of information from CEM images. The average free-response receiver operating characteristic score (AFROC-Score) was presented to validate system's detection performance, and the performance of classification was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Furthermore, we assessed the diagnostic value of MDCS through visual analysis of disputed cases, comparing its performance and efficiency with that of radiologists and exploring whether it could augment radiologists' performance. Results: On the pooled external and prospective testing sets, MDCS always maintained a high standalone performance, with AFROC-Scores of 0.953 and 0.963 for detection task, and AUCs for classification were 0.909 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.822-0.996] and 0.912 (95% CI: 0.840-0.985), respectively. It also achieved higher sensitivity than all senior radiologists and higher specificity than all junior radiologists on pooled external and prospective testing sets. Moreover, MDCS performed superior diagnostic efficiency with an average reading time of 5 seconds, compared to the radiologists' average reading time of 3.2 min. The average performance of all radiologists was also improved to varying degrees with MDCS assistance. Conclusions: MDCS demonstrated excellent performance in the detection and classification of breast lesions, and greatly enhanced the overall performance of radiologists.

Indexed as

breast lesionsclassificationcontrast-enhanced mammographyDeep learningdetection

Identifiers

PMID37691895
PMCPMC10485921
OpenAlexW4386518936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.