Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37691734›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2023

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Repeat Intensive Care Unit Consults.

Matthew T Freedman, Kathryn H Libby, Kristin B Miller, Markos G Kashiouris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew T FreedmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Kathryn H LibbyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Kristin B MillerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Markos G KashiourisDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To better understand the mortality and notable characteristics of patients initially denied intensive care unit (ICU) admission that are later admitted on reconsultation. Patients and Methods: We collected data regarding all adult inpatients (n=3725) who received one or more ICU consults at an academic tertiary care hospital medical center between January 1, 2018 and October 1, 2021. We compared patients who were initially denied ICU admission and later admitted on reconsultation (C2A1, n=144) with those who were admitted after the first consultation (C1A1, n=2286) and those denied at first consult and never later admitted (C1A0, n=1295). Results: Ten percent of patients initially rejected by the ICU were later admitted on reconsultation. There was no significant difference in the adjusted hospital death odds ratios between C1A1 and C2A1 (0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.01; Conclusion: In this cohort, we demonstrated that patients admitted on repeat ICU consultation have no significant difference in mortality compared with equivalent patients admitted after the first consultation. Understanding and further exploring the consequences of these ICU reconsultations is vital to developing optimal critical care triaging practices.

Identifiers

PMID37691734
PMCPMC10482889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.