ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Reduction in Seroma and Other Complications with a Novel Internal Negative Pressure System in Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- BREAST-Q Analysis of Reduction Mammaplasty: Do Postoperative Complications of Breast Reduction Surgery Negatively Affect Patient Satisfaction?Aesthetic surgery journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Seroma, along with other complications, occurs as a result of poor wound healing following breast reconstructive surgery. The Interi System was developed to address the need for more effective approaches to close internal dead space and evacuate postsurgical fluid. Interi is an internal negative pressure delivery system with a unique branching manifold for broad coverage of internal tissue planes. Initial experience in a small cohort undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction showed a clinical and statistically significant reduction in seroma and any complication versus standard drains. The purpose of this study is to report on the safety and effectiveness of Interi, compared with standard drains, in a larger patient population followed up over a longer period than our initial study. Methods: Data on demographics, mastectomy and reconstructive variables, postoperative complications, and manifold/drain duration were retrieved from patient records and compared between the two groups. Results: Interi was used in 100 patients (170 breasts) and standard drains in 100 patients (166 breasts). Groups were well matched in demographic, reconstructive, and mastectomy variables. Interi was removed significantly earlier than drains (16.5 versus 19.6 days; Conclusions: Interi effectively reduced dead space and evacuated fluid from internal tissue planes, thereby decreasing seroma and other complications after prepectoral breast reconstruction. As a viable alternative to standard drains, it could significantly improve patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.