Determining the Best Definition for a Positive Urine Culture in Young Children.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Renal ultrasound after first febrile urinary tract infection in hospitalized children: The ROUTINE prospective observational study protocol.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Urinary tract infection in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
   Article
3. Opportunities for collaboration: the synergy between antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship in pediatrics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
   Review
4. Contaminant Organism Growth in Febrile Infants at Low Risk for Invasive Bacterial Infection.The Journal of pediatrics · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Support for the Use of a New Cutoff to Define a Positive Urine Culture in Young Children.2023

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as