Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37691523›Full record

ArticleCancer2023

Advancing community-academic partnerships to achieve breast health equity: Applying the community-based participatory model to build capacity for sustained impact.

Kathryn M Glaser, Cassy Dauphin, Detric Johnson, Narseary Harris, Christina R Crabtree-Ide, Elizabeth G Bouchard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. An interview-based qualitative study of scalp cooling, alopecia, and disparities in Black breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryn M GlaserDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-8684
Cassy DauphinDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Detric JohnsonDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Narseary HarrisThe National Witness Project, Inc., Buffalo, New York, USA.
Christina R Crabtree-IdeDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Elizabeth G BouchardDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USLadies College · LK

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis formative study leveraged a community-academic partnership to identify barriers to care that are potential sources of breast cancer disparities in Black women. Through this partnership and using a community-based participatory research approach, the objective was to develop a community task force to inform future interventions aimed at addressing breast cancer disparities and increasing health equity.

methodsThe authors assessed gaps in care related to breast cancer in Buffalo, New York, by collecting and analyzing qualitative data from focus groups and interviews with breast cancer survivors and breast navigation groups assessing barriers and facilitators across the cancer care continuum. Then, community-based participatory research approaches were used to build a task force to develop an action plan addressing gaps in care.

resultsThe authors conducted a thematic analysis of qualitative findings to understand barriers and facilitators to cancer care. Three main domains of themes emerged, including medical mistrust, fear, and stigma; the importance of patient navigation as a form of social support; and the importance of faith and faith-based community. Finally, the findings were presented to a newly formed community task force to validate the data collected and set future priorities to address breast cancer disparities and increase breast health equity in the region.

conclusionsThe authors observed that health equity is a critically important issue in cancer care and that developing culturally tailored interventions has the potential to improve care delivery and reduce breast cancer disparities. Learning from and working with community members helps set the future agenda related to health equity. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our overall goal was to assess gaps in breast cancer care in Buffalo, New York, and to use community-based participatory approaches to build a task force to work toward breast health equity. Recent and historical data indicate that the Western New York community is facing a continued wide gap in breast cancer mortality trends between Black and White patients. We collected qualitative data to understand potential sources of inequity related to breast cancer and presented findings to a community task force to set future priorities for addressing breast cancer disparities and increasing breast health equity in our region.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealth EquityBreastCapacity BuildingFemaleHumansTrustbreast cancercancer screeningcommunity-academic partnershipshealth equityracial disparities

Identifiers

PMID37691523
PMCPMC10513749
OpenAlexW4386591946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.