Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37691118›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2023

Mode and site of action of therapies targeting CGRP signaling.

Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez, Edoardo Caronna, Cédric Gollion, Emily Stanyer, Austeja Dapkute, Diana Braniste, Hoda Naghshineh, Liga Meksa, Nino Chkhitunidze, Tamari Gudadze and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Effectiveness of atogepant in migraine with and without medication overuse: Pooled real-world analysis of two independent clinical cohorts.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Inhibition of the METTL3/mThe journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Alejandro Labastida-RamírezWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Edoardo CaronnaHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Cédric GollionDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Emily StanyerWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Austeja DapkuteCentre of Neurology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Diana BranisteInstitute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Diomid Gherman, Chișinău, Moldova.
Hoda NaghshinehHeadache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Liga MeksaHeadache Unit, Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Riga East University Hospital Gailezers, Riga, Latvia.
Nino ChkhitunidzeDepartment of Neurology, Caucasus Medical Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Tamari GudadzeDepartment of Neurology, Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany.
Patricia Pozo-RosichHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Rami BursteinDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jan HoffmannWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK. jan.hoffmann@kcl.ac.uk.
Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ESBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCaucasus University · GEKing's College Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBNicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy · MDRiga East University Hospital · LVUniversité de Toulouse · FRUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Tehran · IRVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting CGRP has proved to be efficacious, tolerable, and safe to treat migraine; however, many patients with migraine do not benefit from drugs that antagonize the CGRPergic system. Therefore, this review focuses on summarizing the general pharmacology of the different types of treatments currently available, which target directly or indirectly the CGRP receptor or its ligand. Moreover, the latest evidence regarding the selectivity and site of action of CGRP small molecule antagonists (gepants) and monoclonal antibodies is critically discussed. Finally, the reasons behind non-responders to anti-CGRP drugs and rationale for combining and/or switching between these therapies are addressed.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMigraine DisordersCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsHumansReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideSignal TransductionAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAmylinAnti-CGRPCalcitoninHeadacheMigraineTrigeminal

Identifiers

PMID37691118
PMCPMC10494408
OpenAlexW4386583001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.