Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37691028›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Predicting sepsis using a combination of clinical information and molecular immune markers sampled in the ambulance.

Kedeye Tuerxun, Daniel Eklund, Ulrika Wallgren, Katharina Dannenberg, Dirk Repsilber, Robert Kruse, Eva Särndahl, Lisa Kurland

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03249597 (Predict Sepsis; the Predictive Value of Bedside Measures in the Ambulance), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03249597 completednot on this map

Predict Sepsis; the Predictive Value of Bedside Measures in the Ambulance

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2017 to 2018Enrolled956ConditionsSepsis, Sepsis Syndrome, Sepsis, SevereArmsBlood test: Glukos, SuPAR, Laktat and HBP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kedeye TuerxunSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. kaya.tuerxun@oru.se.
Daniel EklundSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Ulrika WallgrenGustavsbergs Vårdcentral, Gustavsberg, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katharina DannenbergSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Dirk RepsilberSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Robert KruseSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Eva SärndahlSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Lisa KurlandSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SEVårdcentralen Teleborg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a time dependent condition. Screening tools based on clinical parameters have been shown to increase the identification of sepsis. The aim of current study was to evaluate the additional predictive value of immunological molecular markers to our previously developed prehospital screening tools. This is a prospective cohort study of 551 adult patients with suspected infection in the ambulance setting of Stockholm, Sweden between 2017 and 2018. Initially, 74 molecules and 15 genes related to inflammation were evaluated in a screening cohort of 46 patients with outcome sepsis and 50 patients with outcome infection no sepsis. Next, 12 selected molecules, as potentially synergistic predictors, were evaluated in combination with our previously developed screening tools based on clinical parameters in a prediction cohort (n = 455). Seven different algorithms with nested cross-validation were used in the machine learning of the prediction models. Model performances were compared using posterior distributions of average area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and difference in AUCs. Model variable importance was assessed by permutation of variable values, scoring loss of classification as metric and with model-specific weights when applicable. When comparing the screening tools with and without added molecular variables, and their interactions, the molecules per se did not increase the predictive values. Prediction models based on the molecular variables alone showed a performance in terms of AUCs between 0.65 and 0.70. Among the molecular variables, IL-1Ra, IL-17A, CCL19, CX3CL1 and TNF were significantly higher in septic patients compared to the infection non-sepsis group. Combing immunological molecular markers with clinical parameters did not increase the predictive values of the screening tools, most likely due to the high multicollinearity of temperature and some of the markers. A group of sepsis patients was consistently miss-classified in our prediction models, due to milder symptoms as well as lower expression levels of the investigated immune mediators. This indicates a need of stratifying septic patients with a priori knowledge of certain clinical and molecular parameters in order to improve prediction for early sepsis diagnosis.Trial registration: NCT03249597. Registered 15 August 2017.

Indexed as

AmbulancesSepsisAdultAlgorithmsBiomarkersHumansProspective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37691028
PMCPMC10493220
OpenAlexW4386583747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.