ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Serious Bacterial Infections Associated with Eculizumab: A Pharmacovigilance Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence of infection associated with eculizumab: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Complement Inhibition in the Clinic: Are We Doing Enough to Protect Patients From Infection?European journal of immunology · 2026Review
- Terminal complement complexes with or without C9 potentiate antimicrobial activity againstmBio · 2025Article
- Progression of antibiotic resistance inClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Meningococcal Carriage in Children with Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Receiving Eculizumab Therapy.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Infectious Disease Prophylaxis During and After Immunosuppressive Therapy.Kidney international reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Molecular-targeted agents, including eculizumab and rituximab, are considered treatment options for refractory myasthenia gravis (MG), but bacterial infections can occur as serious adverse events when using these agents. The present study elucidated the relative risks of bacterial infections associated with eculizumab and rituximab using a pharmacovigilance database. Methods We analyzed eculizumab- and rituximab-associated adverse events reported between 2007 and 2021 in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and herein report a refractory MG patient who developed streptococcal toxic shock syndrome during eculizumab treatment. Patients We evaluated a 74-year-old Japanese woman with refractory MG who developed severe bacteremia after receiving eculizumab. Results A total of 44,215 and 108,485 adverse events were reported with eculizumab and rituximab, respectively, from among 13,742,321 individual case safety reports in the FAERS database after data cleaning. We found a strong association between eculizumab and Neisseria infections. In contrast, we found only one case of meningococcal meningitis treated with rituximab. Both eculizumab and rituximab were weakly associated with streptococcal infections. Two cases of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome were associated with rituximab. Conclusion Careful monitoring of serious bacterial infections associated with eculizumab treatment is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.