Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37690602›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Development and validation of a computational method to predict unintended auditory brainstem response during transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation in mice.

Mi Hyun Choi, Ningrui Li, Gerald Popelka, Kim Butts Pauly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mi Hyun ChoiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: mhchoi@stanford.edu.
Ningrui LiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Gerald PopelkaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Kim Butts PaulyDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: kimbutts@stanford.edu.

Funding

Neurostimulation by Ultrasound: Physical, Biophysical, and Neural MechanismsR01NS112152 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BACCUS, STEPHEN A, BUTTS-PAULY, KIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
What are we Stimulating with Transcranial Ultrasound in Mice?RF1MH116977 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTS-PAULY, KIM · 2018 to 2018
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH116977NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising noninvasive neuromodulation modality. The inadvertent and unpredictable activation of the auditory system in response to TUS obfuscates the interpretation of non-auditory neuromodulatory responses.

objectiveThe objective was to develop and validate a computational metric to quantify the susceptibility to unintended auditory brainstem response (ABR) in mice premised on time frequency analyses of TUS signals and auditory sensitivity.

methodsUltrasound pulses with varying amplitudes, pulse repetition frequencies (PRFs), envelope smoothing profiles, and sinusoidal modulation frequencies were selected. Each pulse's time-varying frequency spectrum was differentiated across time, weighted by the mouse hearing sensitivity, then summed across frequencies. The resulting time-varying function, computationally predicting the ABR, was validated against experimental ABR in mice during TUS with the corresponding pulse.

resultsThere was a significant correlation between experimental ABRs and the computational predictions for 19 TUS signals (R

conclusionsTo reduce ABR in mice during in vivo TUS studies, 1) reduce the amplitude of a rectangular continuous wave envelope, 2) increase the rise/fall times of a smoothed continuous wave envelope, and/or 3) change the PRF and/or duty cycle of a rectangular or sinusoidal pulsed wave to reduce the gap between pulses and increase the rise/fall time of the overall envelope. This metric can aid researchers performing in vivo mouse studies in selecting TUS signal parameters that minimize unintended ABR. The methods for developing this metric can be adapted to other animal models.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdMiceAuditory brainstem responseAuditory confoundComputational predictionNeuromodulationNoninvasiveTherapeutic ultrasoundTranscranial ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37690602
PMCPMC12388905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.