Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37690098›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2025

Picking pithy plants: Pith selectivity by wild white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus imitator.

Allegra N DePasquale, Alice C Poirier, Megan A Mah, Cinthia Villalobos Suarez, Adrian Guadamuz, Saul Cheves Hernandez, Ronald Lopez Navarro, Jeremy D Hogan, Jessica M Rothman, Omer Nevo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Allegra N DePasqualeDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7082-4660
Alice C PoirierDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7947-3721
Megan A MahDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cinthia Villalobos SuarezEscuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, Costa Rica.
Adrian GuadamuzÁrea de Conservación Guanacaste, La Cruz, Costa Rica.
Saul Cheves HernandezÁrea de Conservación Guanacaste, La Cruz, Costa Rica.
Ronald Lopez NavarroÁrea de Conservación Guanacaste, La Cruz, Costa Rica.
Jeremy D HoganNature Conservancy of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica M RothmanDepartment of Anthropology, CUNY Hunter College, New York, New York, USA.
Omer NevoGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Amanda D MelinDepartment of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0612-2514

Funding

Canada Research Chairs 950-231257Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE2156/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE2156/3-1National Geographic Society EC-59267R-19Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2017-03782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding diet selectivity is a longstanding goal in primate ecology. Deciphering when and why primates consume different resources can provide insights into their nutritional ecology as well as adaptations to food scarcity. Plant pith, the spongy interior of plant stems, is occasionally eaten by primates, but the context is poorly understood. We examine the ecological, mechanical, chemical, and nutritional basis of plant pith selection by a wild, frugivorous-omnivorous primate (Cebus imitator). We test the hypothesis that pith is a fallback food, that is, consumed when fruit is less abundant, and test for differences between plant species from which pith is eaten versus avoided. We collected 3.5 years of capuchin pith consumption data to document dietary species and analyzed "pith patch visits" in relation to fruit availability, visits to fruit patches, and climatic seasonality. We analyzed dietary and non-dietary species for relative pith quantity, mechanical hardness, odor composition, and macronutrient concentrations. Capuchins ate pith from 11 of  ~300 plant species common in the dry forest, most commonly Bursera simaruba. We find that pith consumption is not directly related to fruit availability or fruit foraging but occurs most frequently (84% of patch visits) during the months of seasonal transition. Relative to common non-dietary species, dietary pith species have relatively higher pith quantity, have softer outer branches and pith, and contain more terpenoids, a class of bioactive compounds notable for their widespread medicinal properties. Our results suggest that greater pith quantity, lower hardness, and a more complex, terpenoid-rich odor profile contribute to species selectivity; further, as pith is likely to be consistently available throughout the year, the seasonality of pith foraging may point to zoopharmacognosy, as seasonal transitions typically introduce new parasites or pathogens. Our study furthers our understanding of how climatic seasonality impacts primate behavior and sheds new light on food choice by an omnivorous primate.

Indexed as

CebusDietFruitAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesMalePlantsSeasonsCebus imitatorfallback foodfood selectionforaging ecologyzoopharmacognosy

Identifiers

PMID37690098
PMCPMC11650937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.