Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37690076›Full record

Observational studyPituitary2023

Care trajectories of surgically treated patients with a prolactinoma: why did they opt for surgery?

Victoria R van Trigt, Ingrid M Zandbergen, Iris C M Pelsma, Leontine E H Bakker, Marco J T Verstegen, Wouter R van Furth, Nienke R Biermasz

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pituitary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria R van Trigt *Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. V.R.van_trigt@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-0679
Ingrid M Zandbergen *Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-8273
Iris C M PelsmaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-4037
Leontine E H BakkerDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marco J T VerstegenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9739-7515
Wouter R van FurthDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-921X
Nienke R BiermaszDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-3594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery.

methodsRetrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery from 2017 to 2019 at the referral center (RC), prior to surgery being considered a viable treatment option (i.e. PRolaCT study). Demographics and clinical data (type and duration of pretreatment and surgical indications, goals, and outcomes) were collected from patient records. Care trajectories were divided into three phases: (1) diagnosis and initial treatment, (2) endocrine treatment at the RC, and (3) surgical treatment.

results40 patients were included (31 females (77.5%), median age 26.5 (14-63) years. Indications for surgery were dopamine agonist (DA) intolerance (n = 31, 77.5%), resistance (n = 6, 15.0%), and patient/physician preference (n = 3, 7.5%). Patients were pretreated with DA (n = 39 (97.5%)), and surgery (n = 3 (7.5%)). Median disease duration at surgery was 4 (0-27) years. Primary surgical goal was total resection in 38 patients (95.0%), of which biochemical remission was achieved 6 months postoperatively in 23 patients (62.2%), and clinical remission in 6 patients (16.2%), missing data n = 1.

conclusionCare trajectories were highly individualized based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the multidisciplinary team's assessment (need for alternative treatment, surgical chances and risks). Most patients were pretreated pharmacologically and had broad variation in timing of referral, undergoing surgery as last-resort treatment predominantly due to DA intolerance. High quality imaging and multidisciplinary consultations with experienced neurosurgeons and endocrinologists enabling treatment tailored to patients' needs were prerequisites for adequate counseling in treatment of patients with prolactinoma.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaAdultDopamine AgonistsFemaleHumansProlactinRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDopamine AgonistsProlactinCare trajectoryMultidisciplinary counsellingProlactinomaTranssphenoidal surgeryTreatment indications

Identifiers

PMID37690076
PMCPMC10539430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.