ReviewGM crops & food2023
Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.
Review in GM crops & food, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Market introduction of plant varieties and products with gene-edited traits.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Effects of CRISPR technology on agricultural sustainability: global applications and turkish perspective.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Industrial and Therapeutic Applications of Hemp: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genome editing and food safety: bridging the validation gap.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- Engaging U.S. experts in environmental oversight of GE crops as it relates to novel biotechnologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- A review of flavonoids at the crossroads of plant defense: integrating biotic and abiotic stress tolerance through AI- and CRISPR/Cas-guided metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Rethinking gene-edited crop regulation: advancing a Principle-based framework for modern biotechnology governance.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- Review
- Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Directed mutagenesis in fruit crops.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Recent developments, challenges and opportunities in genome editing for crop science from a societal perspective.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- The genetic technologies questionnaire in the Greek-speaking population: the moral judgement of the lay public.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- An AI-driven framework for enhancing regulatory precision and efficiency in CRISPR-Cas gene-edited crops: challenges, opportunities, and global harmonization.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The Adoption of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: the Public's Current Perception, the Regulatory Obstacles, and Ethical Challenges.GM crops & food · 2024Review
- Public perception of folate-biofortified genetically modified lettuce varieties in Brazil.Transgenic research · 2024Article
- Genome-wide atlas of rust resistance loci in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovation in agriculture has been essential in improving productivity of crops and forages to support a growing population, improving living standards while contributing toward maintaining environment integrity, human health, and wellbeing through provision of more nutritious, varied, and abundant food sources. A crucial part of that innovation has involved a range of techniques for both expanding and exploiting the genetic potential of plants. However, some techniques used for generating new variation for plant breeders to exploit are deemed higher risk than others despite end products of both processes at times being for all intents and purposes identical for the benefits they provide. As a result, public concerns often triggered by poor communication from innovators, resulting in mistrust and suspicion has, in turn, caused the development of a range of regulatory systems. The logic and motivations for modes of regulation used are reviewed and how the benefits from use of these technologies can be delivered more efficiently and effectively is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.