Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37690066›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2023

Safety of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac during pregnancy on birth outcomes and neonatal mortality: a cohort study from Brazil.

Pilar Tavares Veras Florentino, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Luciana Freire De Carvalho, Flávia Jôse Oliveira Alves, Vinicius De Araújo Oliveira, Gislani Mateus Oliveira Aguilar, Rodrigo De Sousa Prado, Daniel Soranz, Neil Pearce, Viviane Boaventura and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic began: lessons on vaccination and obstetric care in Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Pilar Tavares Veras FlorentinoCentro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-8100
Thiago Cerqueira-SilvaCentro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Luciana Freire De CarvalhoCentro de Inteligência Epidemiológica, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Flávia Jôse Oliveira AlvesCentro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Vinicius De Araújo OliveiraCentro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Gislani Mateus Oliveira AguilarCentro de Inteligência Epidemiológica, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo De Sousa PradoCentro de Inteligência Epidemiológica, Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniel SoranzCâmara dos Deputados, Câmara Legislativa do Distrito Federal, Congresso Nacional, Brasília, Brazil.
Neil PearceFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-7852
Viviane BoaventuraLaboratório de Medicina e Saúde Pública de Precisão, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Guilherme Loreiro WerneckInstituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gerson Oliveira PennaCentro de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília, Escola do Governo de Brasília-Fiocruz, Brasília, Brazil.
Mauricio Lima BarretoCentro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Márcio Henrique De Oliveira GarciaDepartamento de Emergências em Saúde Pública, Secretaria de Saúde, Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, Brazil.
Manoel Barral-NettoLaboratório de Medicina e Saúde Pública de Precisão, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Enny Santos da PaixãoLaboratório de Medicina e Saúde Pública de Precisão, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-908X
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRSecretaria Municipal de Saúde · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRGoverno do Distrito Federal · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 213589/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 vaccines have been shown to protect pregnant individuals against mild and severe COVID-19 outcomes. However, limited safety data are available for inactivated (CoronaVac) and mRNA (BNT162b2) vaccines during pregnancy regarding their effect on birth outcomes and neonatal mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with 17 513 singleton live births conceived between 15 May 2021 and 23 October 2021. The primary exposure was maternal vaccination with CoronaVac or mRNA BNT162b2 vaccines and sub-analyses were performed by the gestational trimester of the first dose and the number of doses given during pregnancy. The outcomes were pre-term birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), low birthweight (LBW), low Apgar 5 and neonatal death. We used the Cox model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI and applied the inverse probability of treatment weights to generate adjusted HRs.

resultsWe found no significant increase in the risk of PTB (HR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.88, 1.10), SGA (HR: 1.09; 95% CI 0.96, 1.27), LBW (HR: 1.00; 95% CI 0.88, 1.14), low Apgar 5 (HR: 0.81; 95% CI 0.55, 1.22) or neonatal death (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.56, 1.48) in women vaccinated with CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccines. These findings were consistent across sub-analyses stratified by the gestational trimester of the first dose and the number of doses given during pregnancy. We found mild yet consistent protection against PTB in women who received different vaccine platforms during the third trimester of pregnancy (any vaccines, HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.63, 0.98; BNT162b2, HR: 0.75; 95% CI 0.59, 0.99).

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that COVID-19 vaccination in all trimesters of pregnancy, irrespective of the vaccine type, is safe and does not increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes or neonatal deaths.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19Infant MortalityPerinatal DeathPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthBrazilCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesVaccines, InactivatedBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivatedbirth outcomesCOVID-19 vaccinesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37690066
PMCPMC10749744
OpenAlexW4386593427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.