Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37690056›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2023

Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Toxicity Prediction.

Julian Cremer, Leonardo Medrano Sandonas, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Djork-Arné Clevert, Gianni De Fabritiis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Language of Toxicity: An eXplainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. AI-driven drug design: a comprehensive review.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Qsarna: An Online Tool for Smart Chemical Space Navigation in Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian CremerComputational Science Laboratory, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB), Carrer Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-7283
Leonardo Medrano SandonasDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-7673-3142
Alexandre TkatchenkoDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-1012-4854
Djork-Arné ClevertMachine Learning Research, Pfizer Worldwide Research Development and Medical, Linkstr. 10, 10785 Berlin, Germany.
Gianni De FabritiisComputational Science Laboratory, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB), Carrer Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-4877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive modeling of toxicity is a crucial step in the drug discovery pipeline. It can help filter out molecules with a high probability of failing in the early stages of de novo drug design. Thus, several machine learning (ML) models have been developed to predict the toxicity of molecules by combining classical ML techniques or deep neural networks with well-known molecular representations such as fingerprints or 2D graphs. But the more natural, accurate representation of molecules is expected to be defined in physical 3D space like in ab initio methods. Recent studies successfully used equivariant graph neural networks (EGNNs) for representation learning based on 3D structures to predict quantum-mechanical properties of molecules. Inspired by this, we investigated the performance of EGNNs to construct reliable ML models for toxicity prediction. We used the equivariant transformer (ET) model in TorchMD-NET for this. Eleven toxicity data sets taken from MoleculeNet, TDCommons, and ToxBenchmark have been considered to evaluate the capability of ET for toxicity prediction. Our results show that ET adequately learns 3D representations of molecules that can successfully correlate with toxicity activity, achieving good accuracies on most data sets comparable to state-of-the-art models. We also test a physicochemical property, namely, the total energy of a molecule, to inform the toxicity prediction with a physical prior. However, our work suggests that these two properties can not be related. We also provide an attention weight analysis for helping to understand the toxicity prediction in 3D space and thus increase the explainability of the ML model. In summary, our findings offer promising insights considering 3D geometry information via EGNNs and provide a straightforward way to integrate molecular conformers into ML-based pipelines for predicting and investigating toxicity prediction in physical space. We expect that in the future, especially for larger, more diverse data sets, EGNNs will be an essential tool in this domain.

Identifiers

PMID37690056
PMCPMC10583285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.