ArticleChemical research in toxicology2023
Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Toxicity Prediction.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Language of Toxicity: An eXplainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- AI-driven drug design: a comprehensive review.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Semantic knowledge improves molecular machine learning for chemical toxicity prediction.iScience · 2026Article
- Geometric Deep Learning-Based Drug Design Models for Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Molecular informatics · 2026Review
- Dynamics-enhanced molecular property prediction guided by deep learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Graph Neural Networks for Medical Imaging Analysis and Biological Data: Integrating Topology, Geometry, Radiomics, and Generative AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Decoupling Size from Shape: Cellular Sheaf Laplacians as Ligand Geometry Descriptors for Binding Affinity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessing the performance of quantum-mechanical descriptors in physicochemical and biological property prediction.Digital discovery · 2026Article
- Multi-task deep learning models for mechanism-based prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) using ToxCast bioassays.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Toxicodynamics and Human Health Risks of Metal Nanoparticles: A Review of AI/ML-Based Predictive Nanotoxicology.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Silver integrated hybrids and nanocomposites for next-generation biomedicine: Beyond antimicrobial coatings toward smart sense-response-heal platforms.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Graph Neural Networks vs. Traditional QSAR: A Comprehensive Comparison for Multi-Label Molecular Odor Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Graph Neural Network-Based Toxicity Prediction by Integrating Molecular Fingerprints and Knowledge Graph Features.Toxics · 2025Article
- Qsarna: An Online Tool for Smart Chemical Space Navigation in Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Machine Learning for Toxicity Prediction Using Chemical Structures: Pillars for Success in the Real World.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Review
- Fate-tox: fragment attention transformer for E(3)-equivariant multi-organ toxicity prediction.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Crash testing machine learning force fields for molecules, materials, and interfaces: model analysis in the TEA Challenge 2023.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Article
- Equivariant Neural Networks Utilizing Molecular Clusters for Accurate Molecular Crystal Lattice Energy Predictions.ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive modeling of toxicity is a crucial step in the drug discovery pipeline. It can help filter out molecules with a high probability of failing in the early stages of de novo drug design. Thus, several machine learning (ML) models have been developed to predict the toxicity of molecules by combining classical ML techniques or deep neural networks with well-known molecular representations such as fingerprints or 2D graphs. But the more natural, accurate representation of molecules is expected to be defined in physical 3D space like in ab initio methods. Recent studies successfully used equivariant graph neural networks (EGNNs) for representation learning based on 3D structures to predict quantum-mechanical properties of molecules. Inspired by this, we investigated the performance of EGNNs to construct reliable ML models for toxicity prediction. We used the equivariant transformer (ET) model in TorchMD-NET for this. Eleven toxicity data sets taken from MoleculeNet, TDCommons, and ToxBenchmark have been considered to evaluate the capability of ET for toxicity prediction. Our results show that ET adequately learns 3D representations of molecules that can successfully correlate with toxicity activity, achieving good accuracies on most data sets comparable to state-of-the-art models. We also test a physicochemical property, namely, the total energy of a molecule, to inform the toxicity prediction with a physical prior. However, our work suggests that these two properties can not be related. We also provide an attention weight analysis for helping to understand the toxicity prediction in 3D space and thus increase the explainability of the ML model. In summary, our findings offer promising insights considering 3D geometry information via EGNNs and provide a straightforward way to integrate molecular conformers into ML-based pipelines for predicting and investigating toxicity prediction in physical space. We expect that in the future, especially for larger, more diverse data sets, EGNNs will be an essential tool in this domain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.