Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37689805›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2023

REPRESENT recommendations: improving inclusion and trust in cancer early detection research.

Frederike Brockhoven, Maya Raphael, Jessica Currier, Christina Jäderholm, Perveez Mody, Jackilen Shannon, Bella Starling, Hannah Turner-Uaandja, Nora Pashayan, Ignacia Arteaga

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Editorial: Serum metabolites in diagnostics and therapeutics.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederike Brockhoven *Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Maya Raphael *Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jessica CurrierDivision of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Christina JäderholmSchool of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.
Perveez ModyDepartment of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jackilen ShannonDivision of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Bella StarlingVocal, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Hannah Turner-UaandjaVocal, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nora PashayanDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-2468
Ignacia ArteagaDepartment of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Mia42@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-6419

Funding

Cancer Research UK EICEDAAP\100011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting cancer early is essential to improving cancer outcomes. Minoritized groups remain underrepresented in early detection cancer research, which means that findings and interventions are not generalisable across the population, thus exacerbating disparities in cancer outcomes. In light of these challenges, this paper sets out twelve recommendations to build relations of trust and include minoritized groups in ED cancer research. The Recommendations were formulated by a range of stakeholders at the 2022 REPRESENT consensus-building workshop and are based on empirical data, including a systematic literature review and two ethnographic case studies in the US and the UK. The recommendations focus on: Long-term relationships that build trust; Sharing available resources; Inclusive and accessible communication; Harnessing community expertise; Unique risks and benefits; Compensation and support; Representative samples; Demographic data; Post-research support; Sharing results; Research training; Diversifying research teams. For each recommendation, the paper outlines the rationale, specifications for how different stakeholders may implement it, and advice for best practices. Instead of isolated recruitment, public involvement and engagement activities, the recommendations here aim to advance mutually beneficial and trusting relationships between researchers and research participants embedded in ED cancer research institutions.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTrustEarly Detection of CancerHumans

Identifiers

PMID37689805
PMCPMC10575902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.