Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37689765›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Evaluation of a polarization-enhanced laparoscopy prototype for improved intra-operative visualization of peritoneal metastases.

Thomas Schnelldorfer, Einstein Gnanatheepam, Robert Trout, Ahmed Gado, Joyce-Ellen Pelletier, Long T Dinh, Martin Hunter, Irene Georgakoudi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas SchnelldorferDivision of Surgical Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. thomas.schnelldorfer@tufts.edu.
Einstein GnanatheepamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Robert TroutDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Ahmed GadoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Joyce-Ellen PelletierDepartment of Translational Research, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 31 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
Long T DinhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Martin HunterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Irene GeorgakoudiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Tufts University · USDuke University · USLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

Polarized Light Laparascopy of Occult Cancer MetastasesR21EB023498 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI GEORGAKOUDI, IRENE, SCHNELLDORFER, THOMAS · 2017 to 2018
$446k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB023498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite careful staging, the accuracy for preoperative detection of small distant metastases remains poor, creating a clinical need for enhanced operative staging to detect occult peritoneal metastases. This study evaluates a polarization-enhanced laparoscopy (PEL) prototype and assesses its potential for label-free contrast enhancement of peritoneal metastases. This is a first-in-human feasibility study, including 10 adult patients who underwent standard staging laparoscopy (SSL) for gastrointestinal malignancy along with PEL. Image frames of all detectable peritoneal lesions underwent analysis. Using Monte Carlo simulations, contrast enhancement based on the color dependence of PEL (mPEL) was assessed. The prototype performed safely, yet with limitations in illumination, fogging of the distal window, and image co-registration. Sixty-five lesions (56 presumed benign and 9 presumed malignant) from 3 patients represented the study sample. While most lesions were visible under human examination of both SSL and PEL videos, more lesions were apparent using SSL. However, this was likely due to reduced illumination under PEL. When controlling for such effects through direct comparisons of integrated (WLL) vs differential (PEL) polarization laparoscopy images, we found that PEL imaging yielded an over twofold Weber contrast enhancement over WLL. Further, enhancements in the discrimination between malignant and benign lesions were achieved by exploiting the PEL color contrast to enhance sensitivity to tissue scattering, influenced primarily by collagen. In conclusion, PEL appears safe and easy to integrate into the operating room. When controlling for the degree of illumination, image analysis suggested a potential for mPEL to provide improved visualization of metastases.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPeritoneal DiseasesPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultHumansPeritoneumRefraction, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID37689765
PMCPMC10492843
OpenAlexW4386569610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.