Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37689706›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2023

Exploring the levodopa-paradox of freezing of gait in dopaminergic medication-naïve Parkinson's disease populations.

Jamie A F Jansen, Tamine T C Capato, Sirwan K L Darweesh, Egberto R Barbosa, Rogier Donders, Bastiaan R Bloem, Jorik Nonnekes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Towards the Prevention of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Is levodopa induced freezing of gait a paradox or an expected phenomenon?: a clinico-pathophysiological hypothesis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jamie A F Jansen *Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Rehabilitation, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tamine T C Capato *University of São Paulo, Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-4141
Sirwan K L DarweeshRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-4593
Egberto R BarbosaUniversity of São Paulo, Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rogier DondersRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan R BloemRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6371-3337
Jorik NonnekesRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Rehabilitation, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Jorik.Nonnekes@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between dopaminergic treatment and freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is complex: levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment for FOG, but long-term pulsatile levodopa treatment has also been linked to an increase in the occurrence of FOG. This concept, however, continues to be debated. Here, we compared the occurrence of FOG between a levodopa-naive PD cohort and a levodopa-treated cohort. Forty-nine treatment-naive patients and 150 levodopa-treated patients were included. The time since first motor symptoms was at least 5 years. Disease severity was assessed using the MDS-UPDRS part III. Occurrence of FOG was assessed subjectively (new freezing-of-gait-questionnaire) and objectively (rapid turns test and Timed Up-and-Go test). The presence of FOG was compared between the levodopa-treated and levodopa-naive groups using a chi-square test of homogeneity. We also performed a binomial Firth logistic regression with disease duration, disease severity, country of inclusion, location of measurement, and executive function as covariates. Subjective FOG was more common in the levodopa-treated cohort (n = 41, 27%) compared to the levodopa-naive cohort (n = 2, 4%, p < 0.001). The association between FOG and levodopa treatment remained after adjustment for covariates (OR = 6.04, 95%Cl [1.60, 33.44], p = 0.006). Objectively verified FOG was more common in the levodopa-treated cohort (n = 21, 14%) compared to the levodopa-naive cohort (n = 1, 2%, p = 0.02). We found an association between long-term pulsatile levodopa treatment and an increased occurrence of FOG. Future studies should further explore the role of nonphysiological stimulation of dopamine receptors in generating FOG, as a basis for possible prevention studies.

Identifiers

PMID37689706
PMCPMC10492797
OpenAlexW4386570513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.