Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37689676›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2023

A deep learning model for rapid classification of tea coal disease.

Yang Xu, Yilin Mao, He Li, Litao Sun, Shuangshuang Wang, Xiaojiang Li, Jiazhi Shen, Xinyue Yin, Kai Fan, Zhaotang Ding and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yang XuTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China.
Yilin MaoTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China.
He LiTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China.
Litao SunTea Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Shuangshuang WangTea Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Xiaojiang LiTea Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Jiazhi ShenTea Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Xinyue YinTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China.
Kai FanTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China.
Zhaotang DingTea Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China. dzttea@163.com.
Yu WangTea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China. wangyutea@163.com.
Tea Research Institute · CNQingdao Agricultural University · CNShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

Agricultural Improved Variety Project of Shandong Province 2020LZGC010Livelihood Project of Qingdao City 21-1-4-ny-2-nshSpecial Foundation for Distinguished Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province No.ts201712057Special Talent Program of SAAS CXGC2023A11Technology System of Modern Agricultural Industry in Shandong Province SDAIT-19-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe common tea tree disease known as "tea coal disease" (Neocapnodium theae Hara) can have a negative impact on tea yield and quality. The majority of conventional approaches for identifying tea coal disease rely on observation with the human naked eye, which is labor- and time-intensive and frequently influenced by subjective factors. The present study developed a deep learning model based on RGB and hyperspectral images for tea coal disease rapid classification.

resultsBoth RGB and hyperspectral could be used for classifying tea coal disease. The accuracy of the classification models established by RGB imaging using ResNet18, VGG16, AlexNet, WT-ResNet18, WT-VGG16, and WT-AlexNet was 60%, 58%, 52%, 70%, 64%, and 57%, respectively, and the optimal classification model for RGB was the WT-ResNet18. The accuracy of the classification models established by hyperspectral imaging using UVE-LSTM, CARS-LSTM, NONE-LSTM, UVE-SVM, CARS-SVM, and NONE-SVM was 80%, 95%, 90%, 61%, 77%, and 65%, respectively, and the optimal classification model for hyperspectral was the CARS-LSTM, which was superior to the model based on RGB imaging.

conclusionsThis study revealed the classification potential of tea coal disease based on RGB and hyperspectral imaging, which can provide an accurate, non-destructive, and efficient classification method for monitoring tea coal disease.

Indexed as

ClassificationDeep learningHyperspectralMachine learningRGBTea coal disease

Identifiers

PMID37689676
PMCPMC10492339
OpenAlexW4386572657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.